Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Labor Management Through Electromyometrial Imaging for Understanding Uterine Contractions
Published on: May 26, 2023
The Accuracy of Self-Screening of Group B Streptococcus in Pregnant Women-A Randomized Crossover Study
Mimi T Y Seto1, Jennifer K Y Ko1, Ka Wang Cheung1
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.
Objective:
Universal screening of vaginal and rectal group B streptococcus (GBS) carriage in pregnant women is now recommended in many countries to identify at-risk pregnancies and reduce the risk of early-onset GBS disease in newborn infants. This study compared self-screening by pregnant women with screening by health care workers in a largely Chinese population.
Methods:
A randomized crossover study was conducted in Hong Kong. All women attending the GBS screening visit at 35-37 weeks gestation between May and October 2015 were approached for recruitment. Consenting participants underwent both self-screening and screening by health care workers. Group 1 had health care worker screening swabs first, and group 2 had self-screening first. A positive GBS diagnosis was made if either swab was positive. The sensitivity of each approach was calculated by comparison with this gold standard. Acceptance of GBS self-screening and neonatal outcomes was analyzed (Canadian Task Force Classification I).
Results:
Of the 672 women approached, 428 (63.7%) consented to the study. The prevalence of GBS was 19.7% (83 of 422). Sensitivities of self-screening and screening by health care workers were 61.4% (51 of 83) and 97.6% (81 of 83), respectively (P < 0.05). Women who used vaginal pessaries and non-Chinese women had a higher positive concordance rate with health care workers (P < 0.05). Neonatal outcomes of GBS-positive mothers were similar in the concordant and discordant groups.
Conclusion:
The sensitivity of self-screening of GBS in Hong Kong was lower than the sensitivity of screening by health care workers. Cultural difference needs to be considered when implementing self-screening in different populations.
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Improving Translational Accuracy
Accuracy and Precision
Random Error

