Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Investigating the Pathogenesis of MYH7 Mutation Gly823Glu in Familial Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy using a Mouse Model
Published on: August 8, 2022
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Diego Jimenez Sanchez1, Ignacio Fernández Lozano1
1Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Insights
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) effectively prevent sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients. New risk models improve identification of high-risk individuals for timely intervention.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Genetics
Background:
- Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a major risk in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are effective in preventing SCD in various populations.
- HCM presents unique challenges for arrhythmia management due to specific cardiac morphology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICDs in preventing SCD in HCM patients.
- To assess the effectiveness of current risk stratification strategies and explore novel prediction models.
- To review perioperative and long-term complications associated with ICDs in HCM.
Main Methods:
- Review of clinical studies and data on ICD implantation in HCM patients.
- Analysis of appropriate ICD intervention rates for primary and secondary prevention.
- Comparison of traditional risk factors with new risk prediction models for SCD in HCM.
- Evaluation of perioperative and long-term complication data, including inappropriate shocks and device-related issues.
Main Results:
- ICDs demonstrate high rates of appropriate intervention in HCM patients, successfully terminating life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias.
- Novel risk prediction models show superiority over traditional methods for identifying high-risk HCM patients.
- While perioperative complications are comparable to other cardiac devices, long-term data on ICD complications in HCM patients are limited.
- Subcutaneous ICDs show promise as a safe alternative, but require further long-term investigation.
Conclusions:
- ICDs are crucial for SCD prevention in HCM, with significant appropriate intervention rates.
- Improved risk stratification is essential due to the relatively low incidence of SCD in HCM.
- Further research is needed to fully understand long-term ICD-related complications and optimize therapy in this population.
Abstract:
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is the most devastating complication in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has proven to be effective in SCD prevention in several clinical scenarios. In HCM population, it has demonstrated to successfully abort life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias despite the extreme morphology characteristic of HCM, often with massive degrees of left ventricular hypertrophy and/or LV outflow tract obstruction. Studies showed a high rate of appropriate intervention in secondary prevention and in primary prevention of patients considered at high risk. This appropriate intervention rate is even more significant considering the young and otherwise healthy patients that compose HCM population. Since SCD incidence in HCM is relatively low, optimal identification of patients at high risk is crucial. Classical strategy of risk stratification based on clinical risk factors has several limitations and has proven to overestimate risk. A new risk prediction model that provides individual 5-year estimated risk appears to be superior to traditional models based on bivariate risk factors. Perioperative complications seem to be similar to those related to the implant of other cardiac devices, while long-term complications have been traditionally in the spotlight. HCM patients are considered more vulnerable to ICD-related complications and inappropriate ICD therapy because of their young age at implant and increased prevalence of atrial fibrillation, but long-term follow-up data on ICD-related complications in general practice is limited. The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator seems to be a safe and effective alternative in HCM, although long-term data are scarce.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Cardiomyopathy VI: Nursing Management

