Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 28, 2026

Quantification of Tumor Cell Adhesion in Lymph Node Cryosections
Published on: February 9, 2020
Quantitative lymph node burden as a 'very-high-risk' factor identifying head and neck cancer patients benefiting from
Z S Zumsteg1, M Luu2, S Kim2
1Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute; Departments of Radiation Oncology.
Background:
Adjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) is standard for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients with positive margins or extranodal extension (ENE) following surgery. However, emerging evidence suggests the number of positive lymph nodes (LNs) is the dominant determinant of survival in non-oropharyngeal HNSCC and thus may better identify those benefiting from treatment intensification.
Patients And Methods:
Patients from the National Cancer Database diagnosed with non-oropharyngeal HNSCC (oral cavity, larynx, hypopharynx) between 2004 and 2014 and undergoing surgical resection, neck dissection, and postoperative radiotherapy (RT) were included. Multivariable regression with first-order interaction terms was used to model the interaction between postoperative CRT and continuous number of positive LNs with respect to overall survival.
Results:
In total, 7144 patients met inclusion criteria. In multivariable analysis, increasing number of positive LNs was associated with both increasing mortality (P < 0.001) and increasing benefit from postoperative CRT versus RT alone (interaction P < 0.001). While there was no benefit from postoperative CRT in patients with 0-2 LN+ [hazard ratio (HR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86-1.07, P = 0.47], increased benefit was seen in those with 3-5 LN+ (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70-1.00, P = 0.05) and those with ≥6 LN+ (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.51-0.82, P < 0.001) in multivariable models. By contrast, margin status and ENE did not reliably identify patients benefitting from postoperative CRT based on statistical tests of interaction. Even in patients with ENE, positive margins, or both, only those with ≥6 LN+ had improved survival with postoperative CRT.
Conclusion:
Increasing metastatic nodal burden was associated with increased benefit from CRT compared with RT alone, surpassing conventional high-risk factors in identifying patients benefiting from CRT. Stratification by metastatic LN number may characterize a very-high-risk patient cohort best suited for treatment intensification.
More Related Videos
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
11:49Single-port Non-liposuction Endoscopic Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Breast Cancer Surgery
Published on: April 3, 2026