Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Fabrication and Characterization of a Conformal Skin-like Electronic System for Quantitative, Cutaneous Wound Management
Published on: September 2, 2015
Nomenclature, Definitions, and Metrics of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Lead Management
1Robert and Suzanne Tomsich Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cardiac Pacing and Tachyarrhythmia Devices, Sydell and Arnold Miller Family Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk J2-2, Cleveland, OH 44022, USA.
Insights
Standardized nomenclature and metrics for cardiac procedures are established, enabling transparent outcome reporting. Participation in registries is crucial for informed clinical decisions and patient care.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Quality Improvement
Background:
- Establishing a foundation for quality in cardiac procedures requires standardized nomenclature, definitions, and metrics for success, failure, and complications.
- An international consensus, ratified by major cardiovascular and related societies, now provides this foundation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the importance of standardized reporting for outcomes in cardiac procedures.
- To emphasize the role of these standards in facilitating clinical decision-making with patients and families.
Main Methods:
- Development of international consensus on nomenclature, definitions, and metrics.
- Ratification by continental heart rhythm societies and overlapping cardiovascular, surgical, anesthesiology, and infectious disease societies.
Main Results:
- A firm foundation for reporting outcomes and making clinical decisions is now established.
- Reporting of outcomes using these metrics and definitions is mandated for transparency.
Conclusions:
- Participation in center-specific or multicenter registries is the optimal approach to achieve transparent outcome reporting.
- Standardized metrics promote informed clinical decisions and enhance patient care quality.
Abstract:
Quality has a foundation that consists of the nomenclature, definitions, and metrics of success, failure, and complications. There is now a firm foundation for reporting outcomes and for making clinical decisions with patients and their families. This has developed from an international consensus, ratified by the four continental heart rhythm societies and by the overlapping cardiovascular, surgical, anesthesiology, and infectious disease societies. Reporting of outcomes, using these metrics and definitions, is now mandated to promote transparency and facilitate clinical decision making with patients. The best path to accomplishing this goal is to participate in a center-specific or multicenter registry.
More Related Videos
04:35Author Spotlight: Innovative Methodology for Implanting and Securing Neural Probes in the Rodent Spinal Cord
Published on: July 12, 2024
11:49Autologous Endothelial Progenitor Cell-Seeding Technology and Biocompatibility Testing For Cardiovascular Devices in Large Animal Model
Published on: September 9, 2011
Related Concept Videos
Coordination Compounds and Nomenclature
Molecular Compounds: Formulas and Nomenclature
Ionic Compounds: Formulas and Nomenclature
Definite Integral
Definition of z-Transform
Drug Nomenclature