The Role of PD-1 Checkpoint Inhibition in Gynecologic Malignancies
Christine Garcia1, Kari L Ring2
1Thorton Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Virginia, 1215 Lee Street, Charlottesville, VA, 22902, USA.
Opinion Statement:
Activity of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors has been demonstrated in ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer, with a tolerable side effect profile and the highest response rate seen in mismatch repair-deficient endometrial cancers. Other biomarkers are under active investigation. Tumor testing for mismatch repair deficiency or high microsatellite instability for treatment with pembrolizumab should be considered an option for all women with progressive gynecologic malignancy.
Insights
Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors show promise in gynecologic cancers. Testing for mismatch repair deficiency is recommended for patients with progressive disease.
Area of Science:
- Gynecologic Oncology
- Immunotherapy
- Cancer Biomarkers
Background:
- Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors have shown efficacy in various cancers.
- Their activity in gynecologic malignancies, including ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer, is increasingly recognized.
- These therapies generally present a tolerable side effect profile.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the activity of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in gynecologic cancers.
- To highlight the significance of mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) as a predictive biomarker.
- To recommend further biomarker investigation and clinical application.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing clinical trial data and scientific literature.
- Analysis of response rates and safety profiles of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in gynecologic cancers.
- Evaluation of biomarker data, particularly mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) and high microsatellite instability (MSI-H).
Main Results:
- PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors demonstrate activity across ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancers.
- The highest response rates were observed in mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) endometrial cancers.
- Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) and high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) are key predictive biomarkers.
Conclusions:
- PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors are a viable treatment option for patients with advanced gynecologic malignancies.
- Tumor testing for mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) or high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) should be considered for all women with progressive disease.
- Pembrolizumab, in particular, shows significant promise in dMMR/MSI-H gynecologic cancers, warranting its consideration as a treatment option.
Related Concept Videos
The Spindle Assembly Checkpoint
Many proteins function together to control the spindle assembly checkpoint. Mutations affecting these proteins may allow cells to proceed into anaphase prematurely, resulting in the...
Feedback Inhibition
PD Controller: Design
Designing a continuous-data controller requires selecting and linking components like adders and integrators, which are fundamental in Proportional,...
Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...
Enzyme Inhibition
Frequency-Domain Interpretation of PD Control
The proportional control gain, combined with the...


