Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Introduction to z Scores01:06

Introduction to z Scores

11.2K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
11.2K
Introduction to z Scores01:05

Introduction to z Scores

1.3K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It indicates how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
1.3K
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

19.6K
z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
19.6K
z Scores and Unusual Values01:07

z Scores and Unusual Values

11.0K
The z score is one of the three measures of relative standing. It describes the location of a value in a dataset relative to the mean. z scores are obtained after the standardization of the values in a dataset. The z score for the mean is 0.
 This score indicates how far a value is from the mean in terms of standard deviation. For example, if a data value has a z score of +1, the researcher can infer that the particular data value is one standard deviation above the mean. If another data...
11.0K
Molecular Orbital Theory II03:51

Molecular Orbital Theory II

27.3K
Molecular Orbital Energy Diagrams
27.3K
Molecular Models02:00

Molecular Models

43.7K
Physical models representing molecular architectures of chemical compounds play essential roles in understanding chemistry. The use of molecular models makes it easier to visualize the structures and shapes of atoms and molecules.
43.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cancer cell-intrinsic inflammasome protein ASC links innate immunity with mitochondrial metabolism in driving pancreatic cancer.

Nature communicationsĀ·2026
Same author

Predictors of unsuccessful tuberculosis treatment outcome in Bhutan: A retrospective study using comprehensive national tuberculosis surveillance data.

Scientific reportsĀ·2026
Same author

Extensive Endemic Transmission of Multidrug-Resistant <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> in Bhutan: A Retrospective Genomic-Epidemiological Study.

Open forum infectious diseasesĀ·2026
Same author

SpatialRNA: a Python package for easy application of Graph Neural Network models on single-molecule spatial transcriptomics dataset.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)Ā·2025
Same author

A spatial transcriptomic atlas of acute neonatal lung injury across development and disease severity.

American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiologyĀ·2025
Same author

A spatial transcriptomic atlas of acute neonatal lung injury across development and disease severity.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biologyĀ·2025
Same journal

OpenIMC: an open-source platform for analyzing single-cell and spatial proteomics by imaging mass cytometry.

BMC bioinformaticsĀ·2026
Same journal

NAP: an open source pipeline for cross-domain microbiome profiling using Nanopore sequencing-derived amplicon data.

BMC bioinformaticsĀ·2026
Same journal

SurvGME: an R package for survival analysis with graphical and measurement error models.

BMC bioinformaticsĀ·2026
Same journal

SimMapNet: a Bayesian framework for gene regulatory network inference using gene ontology similarities as external hint.

BMC bioinformaticsĀ·2026
Same journal

Dual channel drug-drug interactions extraction based on cross attention.

BMC bioinformaticsĀ·2026
Same journal

FeSseqdb: a curated sequence-level database and interpretable machine learning framework for identifying iron-sulfur proteins.

BMC bioinformaticsĀ·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 3, 2026

A Simple Composite Phenotype Scoring System for Evaluating Mouse Models of Cerebellar Ataxia
07:33

A Simple Composite Phenotype Scoring System for Evaluating Mouse Models of Cerebellar Ataxia

Published on: May 21, 2010

37.3K

Single sample scoring of molecular phenotypes.

Momeneh Foroutan1,2, Dharmesh D Bhuva2,3, Ruqian Lyu2

  • 1University of Melbourne Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, 3065, Australia.

BMC Bioinformatics
|November 8, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Introducing singscore, a novel gene set scoring method for single samples. This approach ensures stable scores independent of sample composition, outperforming existing methods in accuracy and efficiency for transcriptomic data analysis.

Keywords:
Dimensional reductionGene set enrichmentGene set scoreGene signatureMolecular featuresMolecular phenotypesPersonalised medicineSingle sampleSingscoreTranscriptome

More Related Videos

Identification of the Genes Involved in Stomatal Development via Epidermal Phenotype Scoring
05:22

Identification of the Genes Involved in Stomatal Development via Epidermal Phenotype Scoring

Published on: January 20, 2023

2.2K
A Quick Phenotypic Neurological Scoring System for Evaluating Disease Progression in the SOD1-G93A Mouse Model of ALS
06:49

A Quick Phenotypic Neurological Scoring System for Evaluating Disease Progression in the SOD1-G93A Mouse Model of ALS

Published on: October 6, 2015

20.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 3, 2026

A Simple Composite Phenotype Scoring System for Evaluating Mouse Models of Cerebellar Ataxia
07:33

A Simple Composite Phenotype Scoring System for Evaluating Mouse Models of Cerebellar Ataxia

Published on: May 21, 2010

37.3K
Identification of the Genes Involved in Stomatal Development via Epidermal Phenotype Scoring
05:22

Identification of the Genes Involved in Stomatal Development via Epidermal Phenotype Scoring

Published on: January 20, 2023

2.2K
A Quick Phenotypic Neurological Scoring System for Evaluating Disease Progression in the SOD1-G93A Mouse Model of ALS
06:49

A Quick Phenotypic Neurological Scoring System for Evaluating Disease Progression in the SOD1-G93A Mouse Model of ALS

Published on: October 6, 2015

20.9K

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Gene set scoring quantifies transcriptomic concordance with molecular signatures.
  • Existing methods often yield unstable scores and biases due to reliance on all samples, especially in small datasets.
  • This limitation hinders accurate analysis of specific sample groups, like cancer subtypes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a robust, single-sample gene set scoring method.
  • To address the instability and biases associated with traditional scoring approaches.
  • To provide an R/Bioconductor package, `singscore`, for enhanced transcriptomic analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a novel scoring algorithm that operates independently of background samples.
  • Implemented the `singscore` method within an R/Bioconductor package.
  • Compared `singscore` performance against established methods (GSVA, z-score, PLAGE, ssGSEA) using multiple cancer datasets.

Main Results:

  • `singscore` provides stable scores irrespective of sample composition and size, unlike other methods.
  • Performance of `singscore` is comparable or superior to existing methods in power, recall, false positive rate, and computational time.
  • The package includes visualization and diagnostic tools for exploring molecular phenotypes in single samples and populations.

Conclusions:

  • `singscore` offers stable gene set scores, crucial for small datasets and data integration, by functioning independently of sample composition.
  • The method demonstrates high and balanced performance across key criteria, outperforming or matching other scoring approaches.
  • Integrated visualization tools enhance interpretation, enabling dimensional reduction and phenotypic landscape exploration for sample stratification and biological insights.