Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.8K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.0K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.0K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.8K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.8K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.6K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.6K
Standard Error of the Mean01:13

Standard Error of the Mean

12.4K
The sampling variability of a statistic is defined as how much the statistic varies from one sample to another. The sampling variability of a statistic is typically measured by measuring its standard error.
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
12.4K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

373
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
373

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A composite measure of cerebral small vessel disease predicts cognitive change after stroke.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

CALM-VLM: CALIBRATION AND SELECTIVE PREDICTION IN VISION-LANGUAGE MODELS FOR RELIABLE BRAIN MRI CLASSIFICATION.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Self-Organizing Recruitment of Compensatory Cortical Areas Post-Stroke Can Maximize Residual Motor Performance.

IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2026
Same author

Associations between contralesional neuroplasticity and motor impairment through deep learning-derived MRI regional brain age in chronic stroke (ENIGMA): a multicohort, retrospective, observational study.

The Lancet. Digital health·2026
Same author

A Streamlined 4-item Wolf Motor Function Test for Efficient Assessment of Upper Extremity Motor Function in Chronic Stroke Survivors.

Neurorehabilitation and neural repair·2026
Same author

Control of the photoluminescence bandwidth of ZnTeSe quantum dots by suppressing the Te cluster effect.

Nanoscale·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 2, 2026

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
08:05

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

Published on: January 5, 2018

10.2K

Sensory prediction errors, not performance errors, update memories in visuomotor adaptation.

Kangwoo Lee1, Youngmin Oh2, Jun Izawa3

  • 1Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.

Scientific Reports
|November 9, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Sensory prediction errors, not performance errors, update motor memory during visuomotor adaptation. This finding clarifies how the brain learns new movements and adapts to changes in visual feedback.

More Related Videos

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.2K
Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms
09:30

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms

Published on: September 13, 2018

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 2, 2026

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
08:05

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

Published on: January 5, 2018

10.2K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.2K
Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms
09:30

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms

Published on: September 13, 2018

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Motor Control
  • Human Movement Science

Background:

  • Motor adaptation relies on updating memories, with sensory prediction errors implicated in this process.
  • The specific contribution of performance errors to motor memory updates remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether performance errors, distinct from sensory prediction errors, contribute to motor memory updates in visuomotor adaptation.
  • To dissociate the roles of sensory prediction errors and performance errors in motor learning.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed fast shooting movements under visuomotor rotation, with manipulated visual feedback to isolate sensory prediction errors and performance errors.
  • Four experimental conditions varied the presentation of targets to strategically correct for performance errors.
  • A delayed washout block assessed memory decay across conditions.

Main Results:

  • All participants adapted to the visuomotor rotation, experiencing a drift away from the main target.
  • While participants attempted to minimize performance errors, memory decay during the washout phase was similar across all conditions.
  • Differences in performance during adaptation did not affect the stability of the updated motor memory.

Conclusions:

  • Sensory prediction errors, not performance errors, are the primary drivers for updating the stable component of motor memory in visuomotor adaptation.
  • This research distinguishes the roles of different error signals in motor learning and memory consolidation.