Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

High Throughput Sequential ELISA for Validation of Biomarkers of Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease
Published on: October 31, 2012
Interpretation of Serological Complement Biomarkers in Disease
Kristina N Ekdahl1,2, Barbro Persson1, Camilla Mohlin2
1Rudbeck Laboratory C5:3, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Insights
Aberrant complement system activation is implicated in various diseases. This review details complement analysis indications, methods, and interpretation for clinical applications.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Pathophysiology
Background:
- The complement system plays a crucial role in innate and adaptive immunity.
- Aberrations in complement pathways are linked to diverse diseases, including infections, autoimmune disorders, and transplantation complications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the clinical indications for assessing complement status.
- To summarize available techniques for complement analysis.
- To guide the interpretation of complement test results in various clinical contexts.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on complement system analysis.
- Discussion of serological assays for complement components, activation products, function, and autoantibodies.
- Clinical case examples illustrating the application of complement testing.
Main Results:
- Key indications for complement testing include deficiencies, aberrant activation, C1 inhibitor disorders, and monitoring complement-regulating therapies.
- Various methods exist for complement analysis, including quantification of components, activation markers, and functional assays.
- Interpreting complement test results requires careful consideration of clinical context and assay limitations.
Conclusions:
- Accurate complement status determination is vital for diagnosing and managing complement-related disorders.
- Advancements in complement analysis techniques are improving diagnostic capabilities.
- This review provides a framework for understanding and applying complement diagnostics in clinical practice.
Abstract:
Complement system aberrations have been identified as pathophysiological mechanisms in a number of diseases and pathological conditions either directly or indirectly. Examples of such conditions include infections, inflammation, autoimmune disease, as well as allogeneic and xenogenic transplantation. Both prospective and retrospective studies have demonstrated significant complement-related differences between patient groups and controls. However, due to the low degree of specificity and sensitivity of some of the assays used, it is not always possible to make predictions regarding the complement status of individual patients. Today, there are three main indications for determination of a patient's complement status: (1) complement deficiencies (acquired or inherited); (2) disorders with aberrant complement activation; and (3) C1 inhibitor deficiencies (acquired or inherited). An additional indication is to monitor patients on complement-regulating drugs, an indication which may be expected to increase in the near future since there is now a number of such drugs either under development, already in clinical trials or in clinical use. Available techniques to study complement include quantification of: (1) individual components; (2) activation products, (3) function, and (4) autoantibodies to complement proteins. In this review, we summarize the appropriate indications, techniques, and interpretations of basic serological complement analyses, exemplified by a number of clinical disorders.
Related Concept Videos
Complement System
Complementation Tests
Organisms heterozygous for different mutations are crossed pairwise in all combinations. If present on different genes, the mutations can complement each other by providing the missing...
Interpreting R Charts
An R chart plots the range of subsets of measurements collected from a process. Each point on the chart represents the range—defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum...
Interpreting Run Charts
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Mass Spectrum: Interpretation

