Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Diversity of Archaea I

Diversity of Archaea I

Archaea, a domain of single-celled microorganisms, are classified into five major phyla based on genetic and biochemical characteristics: Euryarchaeota, Crenarchaeota, Thaumarchaeota, Korarchaeota, and Nanoarchaeota. Among these, the phylum Euryarchaeota is notable for its remarkable diversity in morphology, metabolism, and ecological adaptations.Morphological and Metabolic DiversityMembers of Euryarchaeota exhibit a variety of cellular shapes, including rods and cocci. Their metabolic pathways...

Cell Diversity

Cell Diversity

The concept of a cell started with microscopic observations of dead cork tissue by Robert Hooke in 1665. Hooke coined the term "cell" based on the resemblance of the small subdivisions in the cork to the rooms that monks inhabited, called cells. About ten years later, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek became the first person to observe the living and moving cells under a microscope. In the century that followed, the theory that cells represented the basic unit of life developed.
Multicellular...

Diversity of Archaea II

Diversity of Archaea II

Archaea, one of the three domains of life, exhibit remarkable diversity and adaptability, thriving in both extreme and moderate environments. Historically, most identified archaea have been classified into two major phyla: Euryarchaeota and Crenarchaeota. However, recent molecular studies have expanded this classification to include three additional phyla: Thaumarchaeota, Nanoarchaeota, and Korarchaeota, each exhibiting unique characteristics and ecological roles.Thaumarchaeota: Mesophiles...

Diversity of Protists I

Diversity of Protists I

Excavata is a diverse group of protists that includes both chemoorganotrophic and phototrophic species, with some thriving in anaerobic environments. Among the key groups within Excavata are diplomonads and parabasalids, which are flagellated protists that lack mitochondria and chloroplasts. These microorganisms typically inhabit anoxic environments, such as the intestines of animals, where they exist either symbiotically or as parasites, relying on fermentation for energy production. Some...

Diversity of Protists II

Diversity of Protists II

Alveolates are a group of organisms recognized by the presence of alveoli, which are cytoplasmic sacs located beneath the cell membrane. While their function remains uncertain, alveoli may help regulate water balance by controlling how much water enters and leaves the cell. In dinoflagellates, these structures may serve as armor plates. There are three major types of alveolates: ciliates, which move using cilia; dinoflagellates, which use flagella for movement; and apicomplexans, which are...

What is Genetic Engineering?

What is Genetic Engineering?

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Preconditioning with 1,570-nm Laser before Reduction Mammoplasty in a Patient with a Predisposition for Keloid Scars: A Case Report.

Case reports in dermatology·2026

Same author

Electronegatively substituted adamantyl units accelerate chemiexcitation of 1,2-dioxetane luminophores while preserving chemical stability.

Chemical science·2026

Same author

Human biliary atresia extrahepatic cholangiocyte organoids express increased ER and oxidative stress, altered drug metabolism and cell polarity changes.

Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology·2026

Same author

Chemiluminescent Probes Allow for the Rapid Identification of Colibactin-Producing Bacteria.

JACS Au·2026

Same author

Extruded droplet-on-demand (X-DoD) bioprinting for controlled iPSC-based functional cortical network formation.

Biofabrication·2026

Same author

Lipid nanoparticles engineered to target therapeutic RNA to the pancreas.

Nature·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Encapsulation of Cardiomyocytes in a Fibrin Hydrogel for Cardiac Tissue Engineering

Encapsulation of Cardiomyocytes in a Fibrin Hydrogel for Cardiac Tissue Engineering

Published on: September 19, 2011

Personalized Hydrogels for Engineering Diverse Fully Autologous Tissue Implants.

Reuven Edri^1,2, Idan Gal¹, Nadav Noor³

¹School for Molecular Cell Biology and Biotechnology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 69978, Israel.

Advanced Materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)

|November 9, 2018

Summary

This study introduces a novel bioengineering method to create patient-specific tissue implants from a small biopsy. This approach minimizes immune rejection risk by using autologous cells and extracellular matrix for tissue regeneration.

Keywords:

autologous decellularized hydrogels induced pluripotent stem cells non-immunogenic tissue engineering

More Related Videos

Implantation of Engineered Tissue in the Rat Heart

Implantation of Engineered Tissue in the Rat Heart

Published on: June 24, 2009

Cellular Encapsulation in 3D Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering

Cellular Encapsulation in 3D Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering

Published on: October 26, 2009

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Encapsulation of Cardiomyocytes in a Fibrin Hydrogel for Cardiac Tissue Engineering

Encapsulation of Cardiomyocytes in a Fibrin Hydrogel for Cardiac Tissue Engineering

Published on: September 19, 2011

Implantation of Engineered Tissue in the Rat Heart

Implantation of Engineered Tissue in the Rat Heart

Published on: June 24, 2009

Cellular Encapsulation in 3D Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering

Cellular Encapsulation in 3D Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering

Published on: October 26, 2009

Area of Science:

Tissue Engineering
Regenerative Medicine
Biomaterials Science

Background:

Current tissue engineering lacks fully autologous implants, leading to immune rejection.
Generating patient-specific implants requires both cells and scaffolding from the patient.
Existing methods face challenges in achieving complete immunological matching.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop a versatile bioengineering strategy for creating patient-specific tissue implants.
To overcome immune rejection in tissue regeneration using autologous components.
To demonstrate the efficacy of this approach across various tissue types.

Main Methods:

Reprogramming patient-derived omental tissue cells into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs).
Processing the extracellular matrix into a thermoresponsive, immunologically matching hydrogel.
Differentiating iPSCs within the 3D hydrogel scaffold for tissue generation.

Main Results:

Successful generation of functional cardiac, cortical, spinal cord, and adipogenic tissue implants.
Demonstrated efficient cell differentiation within a large 3D hydrogel scaffold.
Validated the potential for creating completely autologous implants with minimal immune risk.

Conclusions:

This versatile bioengineering approach enables the regeneration of diverse human tissues and organs.
The method significantly reduces the risk of immune rejection by utilizing patient-specific cells and biomaterials.
This technology holds promise for advancing personalized regenerative medicine and organ repair.