Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

A Microfluidic Device with Groove Patterns for Studying Cellular Behavior
Published on: August 30, 2007
The 21st Century Cures Act and Early Feasibility Studies for Cardiovascular Devices: What Have We Learned, Where Do
David R Holmes1, Robert Hance2, Tamara S Syrek Jensen3
1Department of Cardiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Abstract:
Performance of early feasibility studies in the United States can advance the goal of evaluating the safety and effectiveness of new devices aimed at unmet clinical needs and facilitating earlier access for U.S. patients to new technology. Early feasibility studies are an important component of the 21st Century Cures Act, enacted by Congress in 2016. Although regulatory processes have improved since the introduction of the Early Feasibility Studies Program, impediments at the hospital and clinical site level remain. In this paper, the authors review these issues and outline the structure and function of a clinical site consortium designed to address the problems and improve the U.S. clinical trial ecosystem.
Insights
Early feasibility studies in the U.S. help evaluate new medical devices for unmet needs. A clinical site consortium is proposed to overcome hospital-level challenges and enhance the U.S. clinical trial ecosystem.
Area of Science:
- Medical device development
- Clinical trial management
- Regulatory science
Background:
- Early feasibility studies (EFS) are crucial for evaluating novel medical devices in the U.S.
- The 21st Century Cures Act emphasizes the importance of these studies.
- Despite regulatory improvements, clinical site-level barriers hinder EFS performance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review existing impediments in U.S. early feasibility studies.
- To propose a clinical site consortium to address these challenges.
- To improve the overall U.S. clinical trial ecosystem for medical devices.
Main Methods:
- Review of current challenges in early feasibility studies.
- Description of a proposed clinical site consortium structure and function.
- Analysis of the U.S. clinical trial landscape.
Main Results:
- Identified significant hospital and clinical site-level impediments to EFS.
- Outlined a model for a clinical site consortium.
- Highlighted the need for systemic improvements in the U.S. clinical trial ecosystem.
Conclusions:
- Addressing site-level barriers is essential for successful early feasibility studies.
- A clinical site consortium can streamline the evaluation of new medical technologies.
- Improving the EFS process facilitates patient access to innovative medical devices.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System I:Echocardiography
Indications: Echocardiography is utilized to diagnose heart failure, valve disorders, and myocardial infarction. It also assesses cardiac structures' size, shape, and motion,...
Curing of Concrete
Curing Methods
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System II:Types of Echocardiography
Types of Echocardiography
Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE)
TTE is the most common type of echocardiogram which involves placing a transducer on the patient's chest, emitting sound waves to create heart images. TTE is invaluable for evaluating the heart's size, structure, and motion, making it particularly useful for...
Accelerated Curing of Concrete

