Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Endoscopic therapy for gastrointestinal bleeding.

J L Petrini1

  • 1Sansum Medical Clinic, Santa Barbara, CA 93102.

Postgraduate Medicine
|August 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Heat probe treatment for antral vascular ectasia.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy·1989
Same author

Endoscopic management of upper gastrointestinal polyps and periampullary lesions in familial adenomatous polyposis and Gardner's syndrome.

Endoscopy·1987
Same author

Gastric antral vascular ectasia. A histologic and morphometric study of "the watermelon stomach".

The American journal of surgical pathology·1987
Same author

Endoscopic sclerotherapy for bleeding esophageal varices secondary to extrahepatic portal vein obstruction.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy·1987
Same author

A serologic follow-up of the 1942 epidemic of post-vaccination hepatitis in the United States Army.

The New England journal of medicine·1987
Same author

Cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis after seizures.

Southern medical journal·1983
Same journal

Relationship of serum nesfatin-1 levels with body mass index and c-reactive protein in patients presenting to the emergency department with epileptic seizures.

Postgraduate medicine·2026
Same journal

Clinical pharmacokinetics of colistimethate sodium and formed colistin in patients with renal impairment or on dialysis modalities: a systematic review and implications for precision dosing.

Postgraduate medicine·2026
Same journal

The role of type D personality in pregnancy symptom severity, functional limitations, and maternal ambivalence.

Postgraduate medicine·2026
Same journal

Operational and demographic predictors of leaving without being seen in a high-volume tertiary emergency department: a five-year case-control study.

Postgraduate medicine·2026
Same journal

Risk of adverse effects of the concomitant use of statins with calcium channel blockers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Postgraduate medicine·2026
Same journal

Association between frailty and major chronic disease-free life expectancy: a large community-based longitudinal study.

Postgraduate medicine·2026
See all related articles

Endoscopic techniques offer new ways to manage gastrointestinal bleeding. However, cautious interpretation of limited data is crucial due to trial design challenges and potential for unproven, costly methods.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Endoscopic interventions

Background:

  • Gastrointestinal bleeding management is critical.
  • Endoscopic techniques are emerging as therapeutic options.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the role of endoscopic techniques in managing gastrointestinal bleeding.
  • To discuss the available alternatives and the limitations of current data.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on endoscopic hemostasis.
  • Comparison of endoscopic techniques with alternative treatments like lasers, bipolar probes, heater probes, and sclerosing agents.

Main Results:

  • Endoscopic techniques represent a significant advancement in treating gastrointestinal bleeding.
  • Challenges exist in conducting statistically robust controlled trials for gastrointestinal bleeding, potentially leading to Type II errors.

Related Experiment Videos

Conclusions:

  • While promising, the efficacy of some endoscopic techniques requires further validation through rigorous studies.
  • A critical assessment of new, potentially expensive endoscopic interventions is necessary to ensure patient benefit and avoid unnecessary costs.