Epidemiology of silicosis: reports from the SWORD scheme in the UK from 1996 to 2017
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Establishing a Silicosis Rat Model via Exposure of Whole-Body to Respirable Silica
Published on: October 28, 2022
Christopher Michael Barber1, David Fishwick1, Melanie Carder2
1Centre for Workplace Health, Health and Safety Laboratory, Buxton, UK.
Objective:
To document the demographic risk factors of workers reported to have silicosis in the UK.
Methods:
All cases of silicosis reported to the Surveillance of Work-related and Occupational Respiratory Disease (SWORD) scheme between January 1996 and December 2017 were classified into one of eight industry categories, and one of five age groups. In addition, to investigate whether there had been any temporal change, mean age and range at diagnosis was plotted for each year. From 2006, data were also available relating to the date of onset of symptoms, allowing a comparison between workers with and without respiratory symptoms.
Results:
For the period between 1996 and 2017, there were 216 cases of silicosis reported. The mean (range) age of those reported was 61 years (23-89), with the majority (98%) being male. Across all industries, 65% of cases were diagnosed in individuals of working age (<65 for men and <60 for women). Silicosis was reported in young workers across all industry groups, with around one in six of all silicosis cases affecting workers under the age of 46 years. There was no clear trend in age of diagnosis with time. Between 2006 and 2017, 81% of 108 workers with silicosis were reported to be symptomatic.
Conclusions:
Silicosis remains an important health problem in the UK affecting workers of all ages across a wide range of industries traditionally associated with silica exposure.
Related Concept Videos
The Z-Scheme of Electron Transport in Photosynthesis
Introduction to Epidemiology
Causality in Epidemiology
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Bias in Epidemiological Studies

