Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Underwater Endoscopic Injection Sclerotherapy for Gastroesophageal Varices
Published on: August 1, 2025
Identifying optimal candidates for early TIPS among patients with cirrhosis and acute variceal bleeding: a
1Department of Liver Diseases and Digestive Interventional Radiology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Insights
Early transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement significantly reduces mortality in high-risk cirrhosis patients with acute variceal bleeding. Survival benefits are most pronounced in patients with advanced liver disease (MELD ≥19 or Child-Pugh C).
Area of Science:
- Hepatology
- Interventional Radiology
- Gastroenterology
Background:
- Early transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement is recommended for high-risk cirrhosis patients with acute variceal bleeding (AVB).
- Existing criteria for early TIPS may overestimate mortality risk, prompting investigation into refined selection strategies.
- Comparative studies on the survival benefit of early TIPS versus standard treatment across different risk categories are lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the survival outcomes of early TIPS versus standard treatment in patients with cirrhosis and AVB.
- To evaluate the survival benefit of early TIPS across various liver disease severity strata.
- To assess the impact of early TIPS on bleeding control, rebleeding, ascites, and hepatic encephalopathy.
Main Methods:
- A cohort study involving 1425 patients with cirrhosis and AVB from 12 Chinese university hospitals (December 2010 - June 2016).
- 206 patients received early TIPS, while 1219 received standard treatment.
- Fine and Gray competing risk regression model used for outcome comparison, adjusting for liver disease severity and confounders.
Main Results:
- Early TIPS was associated with an 80% relative risk reduction in mortality at 6 weeks and a 51% reduction at 1 year compared to standard treatment.
- Survival benefits were significant in patients with Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) ≥19 or Child-Pugh C cirrhosis.
- Absolute risk reductions were more pronounced in higher-risk patients, with significant benefits observed within 6 weeks for MELD 12-18 and Child-Pugh B with active bleeding.
- Early TIPS reduced bleeding/rebleeding and ascites incidence without increasing hepatic encephalopathy risk.
Conclusions:
- Early TIPS improves survival in high-risk cirrhosis patients (MELD ≥19 or Child-Pugh C) with AVB.
- For patients with MELD 12-18 or Child-Pugh B, further research is needed to optimize early TIPS selection criteria.
- Early TIPS effectively controls bleeding and reduces rebleeding and ascites, offering a survival advantage in specific high-risk groups.
Objectives:
Early placement of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has been shown to improve survival in high-risk patients (Child-Pugh B plus active bleeding at endoscopy or Child-Pugh C 10-13) with cirrhosis and acute variceal bleeding (AVB). However, early TIPS criteria may overestimate the mortality risk in a significant proportion of patients, and the survival benefit conferred by early TIPS in such patients has been questioned. Alternative criteria have been proposed to refine the criteria used to identify candidates for early TIPS. Nevertheless, the true survival benefit provided (or not) by early TIPS compared with standard treatment in the different risk categories has not been investigated in specifically designed comparative studies.
Design:
We collected data on 1425 consecutive patients with cirrhosis and AVB who were admitted to 12 university hospitals in China between December 2010 and June 2016. Of these, 206 patients received early TIPS, and 1219 patients received standard treatment. The Fine and Gray competing risk regression model was used to compare the outcomes between the two groups that were stratified based on the currently available risk stratification systems after adjusting for liver disease severity and other potential confounders.
Results:
Overall, early TIPS was associated with an 80% relative risk reduction (RRR) in mortality at 6 weeks (adjusted HR=0.20; 95% CI: 0.10 to 044; p<0.001) and 51% RRR at 1 year (adjusted HR=0.49, 95% CI: 0.32 to 0.73; p<0.001) compared with standard treatment. In stratification analyses, the RRRs in mortality did not significantly differ among the risk categories. However, the absolute risk reductions (ARRs) of mortality were more pronounced in high-risk patients. The ARRs at 6 weeks were -2.1%, -10.2% and -32.4% in Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) ≤11, 12-18 and ≥19 patients and were -1.5%, -9.1% and -23.2% in Child-Pugh A, B and C patients, respectively (interaction tests, p<0.001 for both criteria). The ARRs for mortality at 1 year were -1.7%, -5.4% and -32.7% in MELD ≤11, 12-18 and ≥19 patients, respectively, and -3.6%, -5.2% and -20.3% in Child-Pugh A, B and C patients, respectively (interaction tests, p<0.001 for both criteria). After adjusting for liver disease severity and other potential confounders, a survival benefit was observed in MELD ≥19 or Child-Pugh C patients but not in MELD ≤11 or Child-Pugh A patients. In MELD 12-18 patients, a survival benefit was observed within 6 weeks but not at 1 year. In Child-Pugh B patients, a survival benefit was observed in those with active bleeding but not those without active bleeding. However, the evaluation of active bleeding was associated with a high interobserver variability. Furthermore, early TIPS was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of failure to control bleeding or rebleeding and new or worsening ascites, without increasing the risk of overt hepatic encephalopathy.
Conclusions:
Early TIPS was associated with improved survival in patients with MELD ≥19 or Child-Pugh C cirrhosis but not in patients with MELD ≤11 or Child-Pugh A cirrhosis. For MELD 12-18 or Child-Pugh B patients, future studies addressing optimal selection criteria for early TIPS remain highly warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
Esophageal Varices-I: Introduction
Bleeding in Fresh Concrete
Bleeding can cause several issues in the concrete structure. Sometimes, the rising water gets trapped beneath large aggregate...
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Naturalistic Observations
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management

