Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

07:48
Intravenous Endotoxin Challenge in Healthy Humans: An Experimental Platform to Investigate and Modulate Systemic Inflammation
Published on: May 16, 2016
12.1K
Investigating health information systems-induced errors
Maryati Yusof1, Mohamad Norzamani Sahroni2
1Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia , Bangi, Malaysia.
International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance
|November 13, 2018
Summary
Health information system (HIS) errors are unavoidable but preventable. A socio-technical approach and multi-disciplinary strategies are key to managing and evaluating these medical errors effectively.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Informatics
- Medical Error Analysis
- Systems Engineering
Background:
- Health Information Systems (HIS) are complex and can introduce medical errors.
- Understanding the root causes and classifications of HIS-induced errors is crucial for patient safety.
- Existing error evaluation models often focus on specific aspects, necessitating a more comprehensive approach.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review health information system (HIS)-induced errors and their management strategies.
- To explore classifications of medical errors within HIS contexts.
- To promote a socio-technical approach for evaluating and managing HIS-related medical errors.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a literature review on HIS-induced errors, focusing on issues, sources, management, and approaches.
- Critically reviewed selected models to identify dimensions of medical errors.
- Analyzed errors based on human, process, technology, and organizational factors.
Main Results:
- HIS-induced errors stem from a combination of human, process, technology, and organizational factors.
- Error classifications are diverse and often context-specific, complicating overall understanding.
- Latent factors like poor system design and inadequate training contribute significantly to medical errors.
Conclusions:
- HIS-induced errors are complex but can be understood through causal analysis.
- Preventive measures and effective management strategies are essential for minimizing medical errors.
- A socio-technical, multi-disciplinary approach is recommended for holistic evaluation and management of HIS-induced errors.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
11.0K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.0K
Fundamental Attribution Error
13.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.8K
Random Error
9.8K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.8K
Margin of Error
7.6K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.6K
Standard Error of the Mean
12.4K
The sampling variability of a statistic is defined as how much the statistic varies from one sample to another. The sampling variability of a statistic is typically measured by measuring its standard error.
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
12.4K
Contaminants and Errors
373
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
373

