Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.5K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.5K
Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

435
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
435
Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

68.6K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
68.6K
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

67.6K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
67.6K
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models01:06

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models

249
Pharmacokinetic models are mathematical constructs that represent and predict the time course of drug concentrations in the body, providing meaningful pharmacokinetic parameters. These models are categorized into compartment, physiological, and distributed parameter models.
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
249
Drug Distribution: Volume of Distribution01:25

Drug Distribution: Volume of Distribution

7.4K
The volume of distribution refers to the theoretical volume necessary to contain the entire amount of an administered drug at the same concentration observed in the blood plasma. The body's intracellular fluid compartment, which makes up two-thirds of the total body water, is contrasted with the extracellular fluid compartment—comprising plasma and interstitial fluid—that accounts for one-third. The volume of distribution can vary depending on the characteristics of the drug.
7.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How people interpret conditionals: shifts toward the conditional event.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2011
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

15.8K

Imprecise Uncertain Reasoning: A Distributional Approach.

Gernot D Kleiter1

  • 1Fachbereich Psychologie, Universität Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.

Frontiers in Psychology
|November 13, 2018
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a mental probability logic using probability distributions to model uncertain reasoning. It demonstrates how logical operators and inference rules handle uncertainty, offering a new criterion for rationality.

Keywords:
coherenceimprecise probabilityjudgment under uncertaintyprobability logicsecond-order distributionsuncertain reasoning

More Related Videos

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

939
Analysis and Specification of Starch Granule Size Distributions
08:46

Analysis and Specification of Starch Granule Size Distributions

Published on: March 4, 2021

5.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

15.8K
Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

939
Analysis and Specification of Starch Granule Size Distributions
08:46

Analysis and Specification of Starch Granule Size Distributions

Published on: March 4, 2021

5.6K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Probability Theory

Background:

  • Human reasoning often involves imprecise and uncertain information.
  • Traditional logic struggles to model probabilistic and uncertain inference effectively.
  • Existing models may not fully capture the nuances of human judgment under uncertainty.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and formalize a mental probability logic for modeling uncertain reasoning.
  • To demonstrate the application of this logic to various cognitive tasks and reasoning problems.
  • To establish a new criterion for rationality based on probabilistic coherence.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing probability distributions to represent uncertain propositions.
  • Combining probability distributions with logical operators (AND, OR, NOT).
  • Applying inference rules to propagate distributions through logical structures.
  • Employing techniques like beta distributions, copulas, vines, and stochastic simulation.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated the model's ability to handle tasks like the Linda problem and suppression task.
  • Showed how to update probability distributions with soft evidence and represent correlated risks.
  • Found that probabilities from different logical forms can be empirically indistinguishable.
  • Introduced second-order distributions to quantify coherence.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed mental probability logic offers a robust framework for uncertain reasoning.
  • The model provides a nuanced approach to cognitive tasks involving probability and logic.
  • Second-order distributions offer a novel, quantifiable criterion for rationality in probabilistic reasoning.