Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Perspectives on Neuroscience
Published on: July 31, 2007
Shared Decision Making About Starting Anti-TNFs: A Pediatric Perspective
Hilary K Michel1, Robert B Noll2, Nalyn Siripong3
1Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Most specialists use shared decision making (SDM) when starting tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors for pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. SDM use didn't differ based on perceived barriers, but physicians using SDM were more open to adolescent input.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Gastroenterology
- Clinical Decision Making
- Patient-Centered Care
Background:
- Shared decision making (SDM) is crucial for patient-centered care, especially in managing pediatric inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD).
- The decision to initiate biologic therapies, such as tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors, requires careful consideration involving patients and physicians.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the utilization of SDM among specialists when deciding to start tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors in pediatric IBD patients.
- To compare physician and practice characteristics, perceived decision components, and barriers/facilitators between SDM users and non-users.
- To explore the influence of SDM on adolescent involvement in treatment decisions.
Main Methods:
- A survey was distributed to specialists regarding their SDM practices for initiating tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors in pediatric IBD patients.
- Responses were analyzed to compare characteristics and perceptions between physicians who reported using SDM and those who did not.
- Statistical comparisons were made for decision components, barriers, and facilitators.
Main Results:
- Of 209 respondents, 75% reported using SDM.
- No significant differences were found between SDM users and non-users regarding physician/practice characteristics, important decision components, or the number of barriers and facilitators.
- Physicians utilizing SDM showed a greater acceptance of adolescent participation in the decision-making process.
Conclusions:
- Reported barriers and facilitators may not effectively predict or improve SDM implementation in this context.
- Further research is necessary to understand the specific role and impact of adolescent involvement in treatment decisions for pediatric IBD.
- Current interventions aimed at increasing SDM may need re-evaluation, focusing on factors beyond perceived obstacles.
Related Concept Videos
Psychodynamic Perspectives on Personality
Psychodynamic theorists argue that unconscious...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
The Behavioral Perspective on Personality
Social Cognitive Perspective on Personality
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...

