Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Flow Cytometry01:23

Flow Cytometry

16.2K
The development of flow cytometry techniques began in 1934 with initial attempts by Andrew Moldavan, a bacteriologist who counted the cells in a flowing capillary system. Moldavan pumped cells through a capillary tube focused under a microscope for visualization. The invention of photometry allowed the measurement of differentially-stained cells, and Louis Kamentsky developed the first multiparameter flow cytometer in 1965 to identify and count the cancer cells in cervical tissue specimens.
In...
16.2K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

13.9K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.9K
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

1.8K
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
1.8K
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

6.8K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
6.8K
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I01:26

Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I

3.9K
A nursing diagnosis is written when the nurse recognizes a cluster of essential patient data indicating health problems treated with independent nursing interventions. The standardized terminologies of a nursing diagnosis help nurses identify and treat patients' problems. Every electronic health record that uses nursing diagnosis must employ standard diagnostic terminology. Developing an efficient, individualized care plan begins with accurate nursing diagnoses.
There are thirteen domains...
3.9K
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II01:25

Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II

3.9K
Nursing diagnoses represent a problem validated by major defining characteristics. There are four categories of nursing diagnoses: problem-focused, risk, health promotion or wellness, and syndrome. The anatomy of a nursing diagnosis includes three components: problem statement or diagnostic label, defining characteristics, and related factors.
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
3.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy from a first-in-human study of volrustomig, a novel PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody.

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research·2026
Same author

2025 White Paper on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis: Biomarkers Calibrators & Stability; Evaluation of NULISA; Neurofilament & Autoantibody Biomarker Assays; Removing IgM Interference; ELISpot & FluoroSpot Best Practices; Modular HD Cytometry; Single-cell Analysis Imaging Cytometry (PART 2A - Recommendations on Biomarkers Discovery, Development, Validation & Regulatory Approval, Ligand-Binding Assays (LBA) and Cell-Based Assays (CBA) PART 2B - Regulatory Agencies' Input on Biomarkers, IVD/CDx and Biomarker Assay Validation (BAV)).

Bioanalysis·2026
Same author

Cyt-Geist: Current and Future Challenges in Cytometry: Reports of the CYTO 2025 Conference Workshops.

Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology·2025
Same author

Iptacopan for Immune Thrombocytopenia and Cold Agglutinin Disease: A Global Phase 2 Basket Clinical Trial.

American journal of hematology·2025
Same author

IPH5201, an Anti-CD39 mAb, as Monotherapy or in Combination with Durvalumab in Advanced Solid Tumors.

Cancer research communications·2025
Same author

Perfluorobutane Nanodroplets for the Selective Sensing and Range Verification of Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy: In Vitro Evaluation on Cells.

ACS omega·2025
Same journal

Detection and Sorting of Extracellular Vesicles and Viruses Using nanoFACS.

Current protocols in cytometry·2020
Same journal

Live Imaging of the Lung.

Current protocols in cytometry·2020
Same journal

Small Particle Fluorescence and Light Scatter Calibration Using FCM<sub>PASS</sub> Software.

Current protocols in cytometry·2020
Same journal

Optimized Stochastic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy for Imaging Chromatin Structure in Pathological Tissue.

Current protocols in cytometry·2020
Same journal

Flow Cytometric Quantification of Granulocytic Alkaline Phosphatase Activity in Unlysed Whole Blood.

Current protocols in cytometry·2020
Same journal

Practical Guidelines for Collection, Manipulation and Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Clinical Specimens.

Current protocols in cytometry·2020
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Automation of the Micronucleus Assay Using Imaging Flow Cytometry and Artificial Intelligence
09:11

Automation of the Micronucleus Assay Using Imaging Flow Cytometry and Artificial Intelligence

Published on: January 27, 2023

2.8K

Flow Cytometry Method Validation Protocols.

Nithianandan Selliah1, Steven Eck2, Cherie Green3

  • 1Covance Central Laboratories, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Current Protocols in Cytometry
|November 13, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This guide introduces analytical method validation for flow cytometry, offering practical protocols for research, regulated labs, and method transfers to ensure credible cellular analysis data.

Keywords:
biomarkerfit-for-purpose validationprecisionsensitivitystability

More Related Videos

Flow Cytometry Purification of Mouse Meiotic Cells
10:43

Flow Cytometry Purification of Mouse Meiotic Cells

Published on: April 15, 2011

18.3K
Measuring Erythrocyte Complement Receptor 1 Using Flow Cytometry
07:20

Measuring Erythrocyte Complement Receptor 1 Using Flow Cytometry

Published on: May 19, 2020

7.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Automation of the Micronucleus Assay Using Imaging Flow Cytometry and Artificial Intelligence
09:11

Automation of the Micronucleus Assay Using Imaging Flow Cytometry and Artificial Intelligence

Published on: January 27, 2023

2.8K
Flow Cytometry Purification of Mouse Meiotic Cells
10:43

Flow Cytometry Purification of Mouse Meiotic Cells

Published on: April 15, 2011

18.3K
Measuring Erythrocyte Complement Receptor 1 Using Flow Cytometry
07:20

Measuring Erythrocyte Complement Receptor 1 Using Flow Cytometry

Published on: May 19, 2020

7.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cellular analysis
  • Analytical chemistry
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • Analytical method validation is crucial for ensuring data credibility and reproducibility in scientific research.
  • Flow cytometry is a widely used technique for cellular analysis, requiring robust validation procedures.
  • Existing guidelines from professional organizations inform best practices in analytical validation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide an introduction to analytical method validation specifically for flow cytometry.
  • To present practical validation protocols tailored for different laboratory settings: research, regulated, and inter-laboratory transfers.
  • To align recommendations with established standards and guidelines from leading scientific bodies.

Main Methods:

  • Development of three distinct validation protocols: limited validation for research, minimum validation for regulated settings, and transfer validation.
  • Integration of recommendations consistent with white papers from the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists and the International Clinical Cytometry Society.
  • Adherence to Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Guideline H62 for flow cytometry assay validation.

Main Results:

  • A comprehensive framework for analytical method validation in flow cytometry is presented.
  • Practical procedures are detailed for limited, regulated, and transfer validation scenarios.
  • The protocols aim to enhance the reliability and reproducibility of flow cytometry data across diverse applications.

Conclusions:

  • Implementing these validation protocols ensures the credibility and reproducibility of flow cytometry data.
  • The provided guidelines support both non-regulated research and strictly regulated laboratory environments.
  • Standardized validation practices are essential for advancing cellular analysis and ensuring data integrity.