Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

A Murine Model of Hemodialysis Access-Related Hand Dysfunction
Published on: May 31, 2022
An analysis of potential predictors of tunneled hemodialysis catheter infection or dysfunction
M Austin Coker1, J Ryne Black1, Yufeng Li2
11 Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Purpose:
To assess the ability of various clinical factors to predict infection or dysfunction of tunneled hemodialysis catheters.
Methods:
A retrospective review of all adult patients who had a tunneled hemodialysis catheter placed between 2012 and 2016 was performed. Tunneled hemodialysis catheters were considered infected based on clinical suspicion or culture-positive bacteremia. Dysfunction was defined as all other non-infectious causes for line failure. Time-to-removal or exchange was recorded. Clinical parameters analyzed as potential predictors of tunneled hemodialysis catheter infection or dysfunction, included the following: age, sex, site of placement, inpatient versus outpatient status at time of placement, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet count, white blood cell count, international normalized ratio, and partial thromboplastin time.
Results:
A total of 177 patients (95: female, 82: male; 71.7%: African American; mean age: 54.9 years) qualified for inclusion. The internal jugular vein was the site of placement in 97.1% of patients with 79.7% of lines being placed on the right side. One patient (0.5%) had minor bleeding after catheter insertion but no other complications were recorded. A total of 17 patients (9.6%) had lines removed or exchanged due to infection at a median of 86 (range: 13-626) days, while 68 patients (38.4%) had lines removed or exchanged due to dysfunction at a median of 42 (range: 1-531) days. A total of 92 patients (51.9%) had lines removed due to completion of therapy at a median of 68 (range: 7-433) days. Dysfunctional lines had a shorter time-to-removal than successful lines (p = 0.007). No difference was seen in time-to-removal between infected lines and successful lines (p = 0.16). Multivariate analysis showed that female sex (p = 0.003) and left-sided line placement (p = 0.007) were independent predictors of line dysfunction. No evaluated factors were predictive of tunneled hemodialysis catheter infection.
Conclusion:
Female sex and left-sided line placement were independent predictors of tunneled hemodialysis catheter dysfunction, but none of the evaluated parameters predicted tunneled hemodialysis catheter infection.
Related Concept Videos
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Hemodialysis III: Nursing Management
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis
Potential Energy
Chemical bonds that form attractive forces between atoms also contain potential energy, called chemical energy. When a chemical reaction...
Potential Energy

