Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Assessment of Vascular Function in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
Published on: June 16, 2014
First-generation versus second-generation drug-eluting stents in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic
Wei-Dong Gao1, Min Ma2, Gao-Xing Zhang1
1a Department of Cardiology , Jiangmen Central Hospital , Jiangmen , China.
Insights
Second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) show improved safety in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients compared to first-generation DES. This meta-analysis found lower risks of mortality, restenosis, and stent thrombosis with second-generation DES in CKD patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular medicine
- Nephrology
- Biomaterials science
Background:
- Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) face elevated risks of adverse cardiovascular events post-drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation.
- The comparative clinical effectiveness of second-generation DES versus first-generation DES in this high-risk population remains a subject of debate.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the safety and efficacy of second-generation DES compared to first-generation DES in patients with CKD.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library identified relevant studies.
- First-generation DES included sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents; second-generation DES included everolimus-eluting, zotarolimus-eluting, and biolimus-eluting stents (BES).
- Pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated, alongside heterogeneity, subgroup, sensitivity, and publication bias analyses.
Main Results:
- The analysis included 14 trials with 9,542 CKD patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
- First-generation DES were linked to significantly higher risks of long-term all-cause mortality (OR, 1.31), in-stent restenosis (OR, 1.69), and stent thrombosis (OR, 1.64) compared to second-generation DES.
- No significant differences were observed between the two generations regarding repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction (MI), or major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
Conclusions:
- Second-generation DES demonstrate a reduced risk of long-term all-cause mortality, in-stent restenosis, and stent thrombosis in CKD patients compared to first-generation DES.
- The efficacy in preventing repeat revascularization, MI, and MACE was comparable between first-generation and second-generation DES.
Background:
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients are associated with very high rate of adverse cardiovascular outcomes after drug-eluting stents (DES) implantation. The clinical outcomes of second-generation DES versus first-generation DES in CKD patients remain controversial.
Objective:
The aim of the current study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety and efficacy of second-generation DES versus first-generation DES in CKD patients.
Methods:
A systematical search of databases of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library was conducted for eligible studies comparing the clinical outcomes of first-generation DES versus second-generation DES. Sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents were classified as first-generation DES, and everolimus-eluting, zotarolimus-eluting, and biolimus-eluting stent (BES) were classified as second-generation DES. A pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to summary the estimates. Heterogeneity, subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis and publication bias were also performed.
Results:
We identified 14 trials involving 9,542 patients with CKD undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. First-generation DES implantation was associated with higher risk of long-term all-cause mortality (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.02-1.69; P = 0.04; I2 = 0%), in stent restenosis (OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.14-2.49; P = 0.008; I2 = 49%) and stent thrombosis (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.00-2.69; P = 0.05; I2 = 49%) compared with second-generation DES implantation. First-generation DES and second-generation DES showed similar efficacy in decreasing risk of repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction (MI), or major adverse cardiac events (MACE) between first-generation and second-generation DES implantation.
Conclusions:
In CKD patients, the use of second-generation DES was associated with lower risk of long-term all-cause mortality, in stent restenosis and stent thrombosis as compared with first-generation DES. No differences were found regarding repeat revascularization, MI, and MACE.
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Kidney Disease I: Introduction
Chronic Kidney Disease II: Clinical Manifestations
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Chronic Kidney Disease IV: Nursing Management
Upper Respiratory Drugs: First and Second-Generation Antihistamines
Histamine binds to specific receptor sites, known as H1 receptors, on tissue cells, triggering inflammation and swelling. Antihistamines combat these effects by competing with histamine for these receptor sites. By...
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Smoking is a primary risk factor for COPD, with over 80% of patients having a history of it. Patients typically experience progressive dyspnea or labored breathing, frequent coughing, and recurrent pulmonary infections. Many eventually succumb to respiratory failure, characterized by...

