Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

09:45
Detection of Copy Number Alterations Using Single Cell Sequencing
Published on: February 17, 2017
12.2K
Computational enhancement of single-cell sequences for inferring tumor evolution
Sayaka Miura1,2, Louise A Huuki1,2, Tiffany Buturla1,2
1Institute for Genomics and Evolutionary Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|November 14, 2018
Summary
New computational methods improve tumor single-cell sequencing data quality by imputing missing bases and correcting errors. BEAM and SCITE showed the best performance, enhancing biological inferences from single-nucleotide variation data.
Area of Science:
- Genomics
- Computational Biology
- Cancer Research
Background:
- Single-cell sequencing offers high resolution for assessing single nucleotide variation (SNV) in tumors.
- Current single-cell sequencing technologies generate noisy data with missing bases (MBs) and errors, leading to false positives (FPs) and false negatives (FNs).
- The accuracy of computational methods in correcting these errors and imputing MBs is not well understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of existing and novel computational methods for correcting errors in single-cell tumor sequencing data.
- To assess the accuracy of imputing missing bases and correcting false positives and false negatives.
- To introduce BEAM, a new Bayesian evolution-aware method for improving single-cell sequence quality.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of four existing methods (OncoNEM, SCG, SCITE, SiFit) and a new method (BEAM) using simulated datasets.
- BEAM utilizes molecular phylogenetic frameworks and evolutionary information within single-cell data.
- Evaluation of method performance based on imputation accuracy and correction of FPs/FNs.
Main Results:
- BEAM and SCITE demonstrated the best overall performance in analyzing single-cell tumor sequencing data.
- Most methods accurately imputed missing bases, but effectively detecting and correcting FPs and FNs remains a significant challenge, particularly with smaller datasets.
- Analysis of empirical data confirmed that computational methods can enhance tumor single-cell sequence quality and improve biological inference.
Conclusions:
- Evolutionary continuity in single-cell sequencing datasets, stemming from clonal descent, can be leveraged by methods like BEAM for accurate data imputation.
- While imputation of missing data and base assignments is feasible, correcting false positives and false negatives remains difficult, especially when the number of SNVs is small relative to the number of cells.
Related Concept Videos
The Evidence for Evolution
48.2K
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.
48.2K
Convergent Evolution
32.9K
Evolution shapes the features of organisms over time, ensuring that they are suited for the environments in which they live. Sometimes, selection pressure leads to the rise of similar but unrelated adaptations in organisms with no recent common ancestors, a process known as convergent evolution.
32.9K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
8.2K
The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
In contrast, regions which code...
8.2K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
3.7K
3.7K
Cis-regulatory Sequences
11.8K
Cis-regulatory sequences are short fragments of non-coding DNA that are present on the same chromosomes as the genes that they regulate. These fragments serve as binding sites for transcriptional regulators, proteins that are responsible for controlling gene transcription and differential gene expression across cell types in eukaryotes. Cis-regulatory sequences can be close to the gene of interest or thousands of bases away in the DNA sequence; however, those sequences that are further away are...
11.8K
Eukaryotic Evolution
41.4K
The endosymbiont theory is the most widely accepted theory of eukaryotic evolution; however, its progression is still somewhat debated. According to the nucleus-first hypothesis, the ancestral prokaryote first evolved a membrane to enclose DNA and form the nucleus. Conversely, the mitochondria-first hypothesis suggests that the nucleus was formed after endosymbiosis of mitochondria.
Contrary to the endosymbiont theory, the eukaryote-first hypothesis proposes that the simpler prokaryotic and...
Contrary to the endosymbiont theory, the eukaryote-first hypothesis proposes that the simpler prokaryotic and...
41.4K

