Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
Does low-frequency vibration have an effect on aligner treatment? A single-centre, randomized controlled trial
Luca Lombardo1, Angela Arreghini1, Luis T Huanca Ghislanzoni2
1Postgraduate School of Orthodontics, University of Ferrara, Italy.
Low-frequency vibration may enhance orthodontic treatment accuracy, particularly for upper incisor rotation and canine/molar tipping. Shorter aligner replacement intervals (7 days) with vibration did not significantly improve overall accuracy compared to conventional 14-day changes.
Area of Science:
- Orthodontics
- Biomedical Engineering
- Dental Materials
Background:
- Low-frequency vibrations (LFV) are explored for accelerating tooth movement and reducing orthodontic treatment duration.
- Optimizing aligner therapy effectiveness is crucial for patient outcomes and treatment efficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy of dental movements using LFV aligner protocols with varying replacement intervals against a conventional protocol.
- To assess if LFV or reduced aligner replacement (7 vs. 14 days) impacts treatment precision.
Main Methods:
- A single-center, randomized controlled trial involved 45 patients undergoing aligner therapy.
- Three groups were established: conventional (14-day replacement), LFV (20 min/day) with 14-day replacement, and LFV with 7-day replacement.
- Pre- and post-treatment digital models were analyzed using VAM software to measure tooth movement accuracy against the prescribed movements.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in overall upper arch accuracy between 7-day replacement with LFV and conventional 14-day replacement.
- Group using LFV with 14-day replacement showed improved accuracy in upper incisor rotation compared to conventional.
- Significant accuracy improvements were noted for LFV in upper canine and molar tipping (vestibulolingual and mesiodistal) compared to both conventional and 7-day protocols.
Conclusions:
- LFV may enhance the accuracy of conventional orthodontic aligner therapy, particularly for specific tooth movements like incisor rotation and canine/molar tipping.
- Reducing aligner replacement intervals to 7 days, even with LFV, did not yield superior accuracy over the standard 14-day protocol.
- LFV shows promise as an adjunct to improve treatment predictability in aligner orthodontics without adverse effects.
Related Concept Videos
Load-frequency control
Frequency-Domain Interpretation of PD Control
The proportional control gain, combined with the...
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of PI Control
Acting as a low-pass filter, the PI controller slows the system's response and extends settling times. This requires...
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lead Control
The design of phase-lead control involves the strategic placement of poles and zeros to balance steady-state error and system...
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lag Control
Phase-lag controllers do not place a pole at zero, but instead influence the steady-state error by amplifying any...
Vibrating Concrete

