Pulse-rate discrimination deficit in cochlear implant users: is the upper limit of pitch peripheral or central?

Cochlear implant (CI) users do not reliably associate an increase in pulse rate above 300 pulses per second (pps) with an increase in pitch. The locus of this upper limit of pitch remains unknown. The present study tested the hypothesis that this deficit resides at least initially at the auditory nerve. The hypothesis was tested by comparing pulse rate discrimination in different neural excitation patterns, in which a large versus small population of auditory nerve fibers was activated. If poorer pulse rate discrimination was found under conditions where narrower spread of neural excitation (SOE) was anticipated where a relatively small neural population was activated, then it would support the hypothesis that the rate processing deficit found in CI users is related to peripheral neural degeneration. Nine listeners (12 ears) implanted with the Cochlear Americas Nucleus^® devices participated in the study. Different SOE conditions were created by (1) selecting electrodes that showed narrow versus broad forward-masked psychophysical spatial tuning curves, and (2) by measuring these electrodes in monopolar (MP) and narrow bipolar (BP0) electrode configurations. Rate discrimination difference limen (DL) was measured at the selected electrodes in two electrode configurations at three base rates (200, 300 and 500 pps). Consistent with the prediction, group mean DL was better (1) at stimulation sites measured with broader tuning, and (2) in MP relative to BP stimulation. These effects were more salient at the more challenging base rates. There was a weak relationship between rate discrimination (above thresholds) and the effect of rate on detection thresholds. Finally, rate discrimination at rates above the known upper limit (i.e., 500 pps) was correlated with duration of deafness and highly predicted the subjects' speech recognition performance in noise. These findings support that pulse rate discrimination depends, at least partially, on neural conditions at the auditory periphery and this peripheral limit predicts speech recognition outcomes with a CI.