Dacryocystosclerotherapy as an alternative to dacryocystectomy

Purpose: The aim of this study was to perform a histopathological assessment of the efficacy of sclerosing agents in dacryocystosclerotherapy (DCST) and to evaluate its role as an alternative to dacryocystectomy (DCT) in a specific group of patients. Methods: Thirteen lacrimal drainage systems of 10 patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO) were studied. All patients were awaiting a DCT, indications being repeated attacks of dacryocystitis with severe systemic or ocular co-morbidities and/or refusal for a dacryocystorhinostomy. Fluorescent labelled sodium tetradecyl sulphate (SDS) or bleomycin were used as sclerosing agents for a DCST taking specific precautions. All patients underwent a DCT after 4 weeks and histopathological evaluation was performed to assess the changes and extent of DCST. Results: There were nine females and one male, and all patients were above the age of 60 years. Of the 13 lacrimal systems studied, the mean duration of PANDO was 1.3 years. All the patients had associated systemic and/or ocular co-morbidities. SDS and bleomycin were used in 6 and 7 lacrimal systems, respectively. The mean doses used for SDS and bleomycin were 0.26 and 0.31 cc, respectively. The post-injection phase was uneventful except for one patient who had a moderate inflammation, which resolved with low dose oral steroids. Histopathological features were more marked in the SDS group and included loss of epithelium, luminal closure, gross fibrosis across the lacrimal sac wall, congestion and hyalinization of blood vessels, and multiple areas of haemorrhages in the sac wall. Conclusions: DCST is a safe and effective alternative to DCT in very carefully selected patients. Histopathology demonstrates SDS to be more effective as compared to bleomycin.