Genetic disease risks can be misestimated across global populations
Michelle S Kim1, Kane P Patel1, Andrew K Teng1
1School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, 950 Atlantic Dr., Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.
Genome Biology
|November 15, 2018
Summary
Genetic disease risk assessment is biased in non-African populations due to differing allele frequencies. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) require diverse data to accurately estimate risks across all populations.
Area of Science:
- Genomics
- Population Genetics
- Health Disparities Research
Background:
- Accurate health disparity assessment necessitates unbiased genetic risk knowledge across diverse populations.
- Current genome-wide association studies (GWAS) predominantly utilize European samples and genotyping arrays, potentially introducing bias.
- Integrating global whole genome sequence data is crucial for understanding population-specific genetic disease risks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how genetic disease risks are misestimated in different global populations.
- To identify biases in current genome-wide association studies (GWAS) methodologies.
- To evaluate the impact of ancestral versus derived risk alleles on disease risk prediction.
Main Methods:
- Integration of whole genome sequence data from global populations.
- Analysis of results from thousands of genome-wide association studies (GWAS).
- Extensive computer simulations to model GWAS with varying study populations and ascertainment biases.
Main Results:
- Significant differences in risk allele frequencies at known disease loci were observed between African and other continental populations.
- Ancestral risk alleles are more frequent in Africa (9.51%), while derived risk alleles are less frequent (5.40%).
- Simulations revealed that non-African cohorts in GWAS lead to biased allele frequencies, whereas African cohorts provide relatively unbiased associations. Genotyping arrays and SNP ascertainment bias contribute to these continental differences, leading to misestimated polygenic risk scores for individuals of African descent.
Conclusions:
- Extrapolation of GWAS results across different populations requires significant caution due to inherent biases.
- Continental differences in allele frequencies persist even with whole genome sequencing and large sample sizes.
- Considering ancestral versus derived alleles is essential for improving the accuracy of genetic risk scores.
Keywords:
Ascertainment biasGenetic epidemiologyGenetic risk scoresGenome-wide association studiesGlobal healthHealth disparitiesPopulation geneticsMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
What is Population Genetics?
64.7K
A population is composed of members of the same species that simultaneously live and interact in the same area. When individuals in a population breed, they pass down their genes to their offspring. Many of these genes are polymorphic, meaning that they occur in multiple variants. Such variations of a gene are referred to as alleles. The collective set of all the alleles within a population is known as the gene pool.
64.7K
Conservation of Small Populations
17.3K
Small population sizes put a species at extreme risk of extinction due to a lack of variation, and a consequent decrease in adaptability. This weakens the chances of survival under pressures such as climate change, competition from other species, or new diseases. Large populations are more likely to survive pressures such as these, as such populations are more likely to harbor individuals that have genetic variants that are adaptive under new stresses. Small populations are much less...
17.3K
Global Climate Change
28.9K
Throughout its ~4.5 billion year history, the Earth has experienced periods of warming and cooling. However, the current drastic increase in global temperatures is well outside of the Earth’s cyclic norms, and evidence for human-caused global climate change is compelling. Paleoclimatology, the study of ancient climate conditions, provides ample evidence for human-caused global climate change by comparing recent conditions with those in the past.
28.9K
Genetics of Speciation
21.2K
Speciation is the evolutionary process resulting in the formation of new, distinct species—groups of reproductively isolated populations.
21.2K
What is Genetic Engineering?
80.2K
Overview
80.2K
Population Growth
28.6K
Population size is dynamic, increasing with birth rates and immigration, and decreasing with death rates and emigration. In ideal conditions with unlimited resources, populations can increase exponentially, which plots as a J-shaped growth rate curve of population size against time. This type of curve is characteristic of newly-introduced invasive species, or populations that have suffered catastrophic declines and are rebounding.
28.6K


