Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Conformity01:20

Conformity

48.2K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
48.2K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

32.4K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
32.4K
Social Scripts02:10

Social Scripts

10.3K
People tend to know what behavior is expected of them in specific, familiar settings. A script is a person’s knowledge about the sequence of events expected in a specific setting (Schank & Abelson, 1977). Essentially, scripts are a particular kind of schema, one containing default values for the features within an event. In the restaurant example, the script's features include the props (e.g., tables, menu, food, and money), the roles to be played (e.g., customer and waiter),...
10.3K
Social Traps01:41

Social Traps

26.9K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
26.9K
Social Exchange Theory02:06

Social Exchange Theory

40.8K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
40.8K
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison02:57

The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison

56.1K
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
56.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Unraveling the Unexpected: How Pilots Can Successfully Manage Unexpected Events.

Human factors·2026
Same author

The role of ADHD in aggressive driving behavior among young adult drivers: effects of traffic aggressiveness and roadway environments.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2026
Same author

Human vigilance in the age of intelligent machines: Challenges and prospects.

Ergonomics·2026
Same author

Training for vigilance on the move using knowledge of results: The effects of feedback type on performance and subjective response.

Ergonomics·2025
Same author

Correction: How and why humans trust: A meta-analysis and elaborated model.

Frontiers in psychology·2025
Same author

Can ergonomics/human factors survive?

Ergonomics·2025
Same journal

Effects of Task Priority and Difficulty in Multitasking Across Screens.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Compatibility Effects With Simple Lever Tools: A Replication and Extension Beyond Simple Button Responses.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Effects of Egocentric and Exocentric Supervisor Viewpoint Perspectives on Motion Plan Legibility and Decision Support in Automated Spacecraft Docking Maneuvers.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

System-Wide Trust (SWT) Versus Component-Specific Trust (CST) in Multi-Agent Human-Agent Teams: Individual Variability in Trust Bias.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Driver Adaptation to Partially Automated Driving in Urban Environments: Effects of Repeated Exposure and System Capabilities on Drivers' Trust, Monitoring, and Response.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Modeling Human Expertise in a Sanding Task.

Human factors·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 2, 2026

SSVEP-based Experimental Procedure for Brain-Robot Interaction with Humanoid Robots
11:01

SSVEP-based Experimental Procedure for Brain-Robot Interaction with Humanoid Robots

Published on: November 24, 2015

13.7K

Social Conformity Effects on Trust in Simulation-Based Human-Robot Interaction.

William G Volante, Janine Sosna, Theresa Kessler1

  • 1University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA.

Human Factors
|November 16, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Social group opinions significantly impact human trust in robots, often overriding direct robot communication. People tend to conform to group trust judgments rather than relying on their own assessments.

Keywords:
HRIcommunicationindividual differencessocial conformitytrust

More Related Videos

Designing and Implementing Nervous System Simulations on LEGO Robots
10:34

Designing and Implementing Nervous System Simulations on LEGO Robots

Published on: May 25, 2013

15.6K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 2, 2026

SSVEP-based Experimental Procedure for Brain-Robot Interaction with Humanoid Robots
11:01

SSVEP-based Experimental Procedure for Brain-Robot Interaction with Humanoid Robots

Published on: November 24, 2015

13.7K
Designing and Implementing Nervous System Simulations on LEGO Robots
10:34

Designing and Implementing Nervous System Simulations on LEGO Robots

Published on: May 25, 2013

15.6K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.6K

Area of Science:

  • Human-Robot Interaction
  • Social Psychology
  • Trust Dynamics

Background:

  • Existing research focuses on robot, human, and environmental factors in human-robot relationships.
  • The combined effects of social conformity and communication on human-robot trust remain underexplored.
  • Social conformity and communication influence human-human trust, suggesting similar effects in human-robot interactions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the co-acting influences of communication and social conformity on trust in human-robot interaction.
  • To determine whether social group attitudes or direct robot communication has a greater impact on trust.

Main Methods:

  • A 2x2 experimental design was employed, manipulating robot communication (present/absent) and social group influence (positive/negative).
  • Participants' trust levels were measured following exposure to robot communication and social group attitudes.

Main Results:

  • Robot communication was found to mediate trust levels between humans and robots.
  • However, the influence of social information, specifically expressed social group attitudes, dominated and overcame the effect of direct robot communication on trust.
  • Participants' trust attributions to the robot were primarily shaped by the prevailing social group sentiment.

Conclusions:

  • Human social assessments are more critical than direct robot communication in establishing human-robot trust.
  • When social opinions are present, individuals tend to conform to the group's displayed trust rather than making independent judgments.
  • Group perceptions can exert a stronger influence on trust than robot communication, particularly for new team members.