Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Study of Protein Dynamics via Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy
Published on: April 13, 2022
Characterizing contrast origins and noise contribution in spin-echo EPI BOLD at 3 T
1Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Canada.
Abstract:
In this work, we characterize contrast origins and noise contributions of spin echo (SE) EPI BOLD signal at 3 T. SE BOLD is a fMRI method of choice for imaging brain regions affected by susceptibility artifacts at lower fields, but its sensitivity remains a limiting factor for whole-brain imaging. To resolve this, the signal and noise contributions as well as TE dependence of SE EPI are characterized in this study. By integrating a two-compartment BOLD model with a physiological-thermal noise model, a new SE-BOLD signal model was introduced. The new SE-BOLD model was fit into SE-EPI fMRI data acquired during hypercapnic manipulations at various TEs, using typical fMRI voxel dimensions (3.4 × 3.4 × 5 mm3). Our model predicts intra- and extravascular signal and noise contributions consistent with our understanding of the SE-EPI contrast mechanism. The intravascular BOLD contribution is shown to dominate at TEs lower than tissue T2, but the physiological noise contributions in SE-EPI signal is also shown to be lower than that of gradient-echo (GE). Furthermore, SE-EPI contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) is not maximized at tissue T2 as is typically assumed. To summarize, a new SE-BOLD model was proposed to characterize SE-BOLD contrast and physiological noise contribution at 3 T. Results suggests that SE-BOLD sensitivity can be improved by using shorter TEs, making it a more attractive choice for fMRI, especially in regions with susceptibility artifacts. Such optimizations could also help extend the application of SE BOLD to WM fMRI studies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Echo
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Binet's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...

