Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Chronic Spinal Cord Compression
Published on: May 7, 2019
Gadoxetic acid-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging using optimized integrated combination of compressed
Nobuyuki Kawai1, Satoshi Goshima1, Yoshifumi Noda1
1Department of Radiology, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1194, Japan.
Purpose:
To evaluate the feasibility of optimized integrated combination of compressed sensing and parallel imaging technique (prototype Compressed SENSE) in gadoxetic acid-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.
Materials And Methods:
Sixty-one patients underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced dynamic imaging using enhanced T1 high-resolution isotropic volume excitation (eTHRIVE) with the Compressed SENSE (CS-eTHRIVE; C SENSE factor, 3.4; acquisition time, 10 s). Results were compared with 61 propensity score-matched patients who underwent conventional eTHRIVE (eTHRIVE; acquisition time, 20 s). For quantitative image analyses, signal intensity ratio (SIR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), coefficient of variation (CV) of liver parenchyma were calculated in each dynamic phase. For qualitative image analyses, two radiologists rated the homogeneity of liver parenchyma, sharpness of liver edge and left external lobe, motion artifacts, and overall image quality in each dynamic phase using a five-point scale.
Results:
SIRs of liver parenchyma with CS-eTHRIVE were significantly higher than with eTHRIVE in the hepatic arterial phase (HAP) (1.70 vs. 1.52) and transitional phase (TP) (2.18 vs. 2.06) (P ≤ 0.030). SNR of liver parenchyma were comparable between the two sequences in all phases. CV of liver parenchyma in HAP with eTHRIVE (0.079) was significantly higher than with CS-eTHRIVE (0.065) (P < 0.001). Motion artifacts were significantly reduced with CS-eTHRIVE compared with eTHRIVE in all phases (P ≤ 0.005). The appearance ratio of extensive motion artifacts in HAP with CS-eTHRIVE (0/61; 0%) were significantly reduced compared with eTHRIVE (4/61; 6.6%) (P = 0.042). Overall image quality with CS-eTHRIVE was significantly better than with eTHRIVE in all phases (P ≤ 0.039).
Conclusion:
CS-eTHRIVE compared with eTHRIVE effectively reduced the acquisition time and extensive motion artifacts without degradation of image quality.
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Parallel Resonance
Magnetic Force Between Two Parallel Currents
The force exerted by the magnetic field due to the first conductor over a finite length of the second conductor is given as the product of the current in the second conductor and the vector product of the length vector along the current element and the field due to the first conductor. According to the...
Atomic Nuclei: Magnetic Resonance
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR): Overview
NMR spectroscopy generates a spectrum where the characteristic absorption frequencies of the sample are...

