Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Presentation01:25

Self-Presentation

323
Self-presentation is a fundamental aspect of social interaction, shaping both how others perceive individuals and how they view themselves. This dynamic process influences behaviors in various social settings, often leading people to adjust their appearance, speech, and demeanor to align with their desired identity. While self-presentation can be deliberate or unconscious, it plays a critical role in interpersonal relationships and self-perception.Forms of Self-PresentationSelf-presentation can...
323
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping02:05

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

44.8K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
44.8K
Strategies of Self-Presentation I: Strategic Self-Presentation01:12

Strategies of Self-Presentation I: Strategic Self-Presentation

219
Strategic self-presentation refers to individuals' intentional efforts to influence how others perceive them. This process is employed in various social and professional settings, such as job interviews, dating, politics, and legal contexts, where individuals seek to shape impressions to gain social or material advantages. While people generally present themselves in ways that align with their authentic characteristics, external factors, such as cognitive load, can hinder their ability to...
219
Processes of Self-Presentation01:29

Processes of Self-Presentation

249
Effective self-presentation is a central component of social interaction and identity construction. It relies on the dynamic processes of defining the situation and engaging in self-disclosure. These mechanisms help individuals navigate social context expectations and manage how others perceive them, fostering mutual understanding and relationship development.Defining the SituationSocial situations are shaped by collectively understood frames—a set of widely understood rules or...
249
Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification01:17

Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification

192
Self-verification is a fundamental psychological drive wherein individuals seek affirmation of their self-concept from others, striving for consistency between their internal self-view and external perceptions. This drive operates even when the self-concept is negative, influencing interpersonal behavior and feedback preferences in complex and often counterintuitive ways. Unlike the self-enhancement motive, which seeks positive evaluations, self-verification prioritizes coherence and...
192
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring01:24

Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring

262
Self-monitoring is a central construct in understanding individual differences in self-presentation strategies across social contexts. It refers to how individuals observe, regulate, and control their expressive behavior and self-presentation following situational cues. Self-monitoring reflects a person's sensitivity to social appropriateness and willingness to adapt behavior to fit varying interpersonal demands.High vs. Low Self-Monitoring IndividualsIndividuals high in self-monitoring are...
262

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Electrophysiologically-based electrode selection has the potential to improve speech perception in cochlear-implant users.

Hearing research·2026
Same author

Theoretical and Experimental Characterization of Cochlear-Implant Stimulation Artifacts in EEG Recordings.

IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2026
Same author

Using Behavioral Tasks to Probe Listening Difficulties in Normal Hearing or Near-to-Normal Hearing Children Up To 14 Years Old: A Systematic Review.

Ear and hearing·2025
Same author

Insights into the multi-factorial nature of reading difficulties: exploring phonological, visual, and attentional challenges in children.

Journal of communication disorders·2025
Same author

ALICE: Improved Speech in Noise Understanding with Self-guided Hearing Care.

Trends in hearing·2025
Same author

Longitudinal Developmental Outcomes of Children With Prelingual Single-Sided Deafness With and Without a Cochlear Implant and Recommendations for Follow-Up.

Ear and hearing·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Rapid Homogeneous Detection of Biological Assays Using Magnetic Modulation Biosensing System
06:58

Rapid Homogeneous Detection of Biological Assays Using Magnetic Modulation Biosensing System

Published on: June 13, 2010

10.0K

The effect of presentation level on spectrotemporal modulation detection.

Sara Magits1, Arturo Moncada-Torres1, Lieselot Van Deun2

  • 1KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Dept. of Neurosciences, ExpORL, Herestraat 49, Bus 721, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.

Hearing Research
|November 16, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Presentation level significantly impacts spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity tests. Higher levels worsen thresholds, affecting speech-in-noise understanding, especially at higher ripple densities.

Keywords:
computational modelnormal hearingspectral ripple testspectrotemporal sensitivity

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
06:37

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Published on: December 15, 2023

5.4K
How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker
05:48

How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker

Published on: September 6, 2017

9.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Rapid Homogeneous Detection of Biological Assays Using Magnetic Modulation Biosensing System
06:58

Rapid Homogeneous Detection of Biological Assays Using Magnetic Modulation Biosensing System

Published on: June 13, 2010

10.0K
Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
06:37

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Published on: December 15, 2023

5.4K
How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker
05:48

How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker

Published on: September 6, 2017

9.0K

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Speech Perception
  • Psychoacoustics

Background:

  • Speech comprehension in noise depends on spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity.
  • Spectral ripple tests measure this sensitivity at various presentation levels.
  • The effect of presentation level on these thresholds is not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how presentation level influences spectrotemporal modulation thresholds.
  • To examine the impact of different ripple densities on these thresholds.
  • To explore the underlying mechanisms using a computational model.

Main Methods:

  • Behavioral testing with normal-hearing adults.
  • Administration of spectral ripple tests at varying presentation levels and ripple densities (2 and 4 ripples/octave).
  • Computational modeling of auditory nerve processes.

Main Results:

  • Increasing presentation level led to significantly worse discrimination thresholds at higher ripple densities (2 and 4 ripples/octave).
  • Computational model results suggest decreased spectrotemporal representation due to cochlear filter broadening and neural saturation.
  • These factors likely contribute to the observed decline in performance.

Conclusions:

  • Presentation level is a critical factor in spectrotemporal modulation detection.
  • Results highlight the need to consider presentation level during testing for accurate assessment of auditory processing.
  • Findings have implications for understanding speech-in-noise difficulties.