Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Bayesian sample size determination for phase IIA clinical trials using historical data and semi-parametric prior's
Paola Berchialla1, Sarah Zohar2, Ileana Baldi3
1Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
This study introduces Bayesian alternatives to Simon's two-stage design for phase IIA clinical trials. These methods better handle uncertainty in prior beliefs about response rates, improving trial planning.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Clinical Trial Design
- Pharmacoeconomics
Background:
- Simon's two-stage design is standard for phase IIA trials, optimizing sample size.
- High uncertainty in pre-trial response rate beliefs necessitates alternative approaches.
- Bayesian methods naturally incorporate distributional information, addressing uncertainty.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore Bayesian counterparts of Simon's two-stage design.
- To develop methods for constructing prior distributions in Bayesian clinical trial designs.
- To evaluate the impact of different priors on sample size determination.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the predictive version of the single threshold design.
- Specified distinct analysis and design prior distributions.
- Derived prior distributions using linear combinations of B-splines, moving beyond traditional beta priors.
- Applied to a phase IIA trial for an anti-HER2 DNA vaccine in breast cancer.
Main Results:
- Demonstrated a method for constructing clinical priors from summarized data, accommodating high uncertainty.
- Evaluated the influence of various prior distributions on sample size calculations.
- Provided a flexible Bayesian framework for two-stage trial designs.
Conclusions:
- Bayesian two-stage designs offer a robust alternative to Simon's design when prior response rate uncertainty is high.
- The B-spline approach provides a flexible way to define priors in Bayesian clinical trial planning.
- This methodology enhances the precision of sample size determination in early-phase oncology trials.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Sample Size Calculation
The sample size for the given experiment or sampling effort is fundamental to any study design. Sample size decides the number of...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters