Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Myocardial Infarction by Percutaneous Embolization Coil Deployment in a Swine Model
Published on: November 4, 2021
Blood Flow Analysis in Coil Embolized Aneurysms: Difference between Porous Media and Real Coil Geometry Model
Abstract:
To clarify the mechanism of aneurysmal recanalization, it is necessary to understand the characteristics of the blood flow inside the aneurysm in particular the flow resistance generated by the coil. In studies using computational fluid dynamics (CFD), mainly two approaches have been used to model the coil embolized aneurysm; modeling the coils as porous media or by real coil geometries. In this study, we calculated the pressure drop along a vessel through a coiled region modeled as porous media or by real coil geometry and compared the pressure drop generated by the two coil models. The porous media model was described by Darcy's law and Ergun's equation, while the real coil geometry was generated using finite element method (FEM) structural analysis. We calculated the pressure drop for inlet velocities from 0.1 m/s to 1.0 m/s in steps of 0.1 m/s. Our results indicated that the porous media model may produce larger pressure drops than the real coil geometry model under low packing density. The value of the pressure drop was also changed due to the difference of coil distribution even if the packing density was the same.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Coordination Number and Geometry
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Blood Flow
Geometry of Hyperbolas
Autoregulation of Blood Flow
Chemical Signaling in Autoregulation
Chemical signaling operates at the precapillary sphincter level, inciting either contraction or relaxation....
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Blood Flow-Limited Versus Diffusion-Limited Models

