Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Drug Classes and Categories01:25

Drug Classes and Categories

3.1K
Drugs can be classified according to their chemical composition or their intended therapeutic application. For instance, anti-infective agents that possess the ability to eliminate pathogens or suppress their growth and reproduction can be grouped based on the organisms they target or their chemical structure. Furthermore, drugs can be divided into prescription, nonprescription, or controlled substances. Prescription medications, such as antibiotics, require oversight from a licensed healthcare...
3.1K
Antibody Structure and Classes01:25

Antibody Structure and Classes

9.1K
Antibodies, also known as immunoglobulins, are produced by B cells in response to foreign substances, such as bacteria and viruses. These proteins are critical for recognizing and neutralizing these substances, protecting the body from potential harm.
The basic structure of an antibody consists of four protein chains: two identical heavy chains and two identical light chains. These chains are held together by disulfide bonds and other non-covalent interactions, forming a Y-shaped structure.
9.1K
Electric Potential and Potential Difference01:16

Electric Potential and Potential Difference

5.7K
Suppose a positive test charge moves away from a positive static charge, then the Coulomb force does positive work, and its electric potential energy decreases. The potential energy per unit charge is defined as the electric potential. The electric potential is independent of the test charge.
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
5.7K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.3K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.3K
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

3.8K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
3.8K
Sum and Difference OpAmps01:22

Sum and Difference OpAmps

1.4K
Operational amplifiers (op-amps) are versatile devices that extend beyond amplification. In this context, two specific op-amp configurations are explored: the summing and difference amplifiers.
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Acute stress induces coordinated reorganization across interacting brain networks.

Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)·2026
Same author

Erratum: Global activity shaping strategies for a retinal implant (2019<i>J. Neural Eng</i>.<b>16</b>026008).

Journal of neural engineering·2026
Same author

Hybrid optogenetic and electrical stimulation of retinal ganglion cells for artificial vision.

Brain stimulation·2025
Same author

Forensic gender and stature identification from footprint images using machine learning.

Forensic science international·2025
Same author

Resting-state brain dynamics are associated with body fat percentage and sympathetic outflow in healthy adults.

Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society·2025
Same author

Resting-state brain dynamics are associated with cardiovascular and metabolic profiles in healthy adults.

Journal of neurophysiology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 2, 2026

An Isolated Retinal Preparation to Record Light Response from Genetically Labeled Retinal Ganglion Cells
13:02

An Isolated Retinal Preparation to Record Light Response from Genetically Labeled Retinal Ganglion Cells

Published on: January 26, 2011

17.3K

Differences between morphological and electrophysiological retinal ganglion cell classes.

Syeda Zehra, G Damien Hicks, Alex Adjinicolaou

    Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference
    |November 17, 2018
    PubMed
    Summary

    Machine learning analysis of retinal ganglion cell data revealed that electrophysiological properties do not align with traditional morphological or functional classifications used in neuroscience research for retinal implants.

    More Related Videos

    Single-cell RNA-Seq of Defined Subsets of Retinal Ganglion Cells
    11:26

    Single-cell RNA-Seq of Defined Subsets of Retinal Ganglion Cells

    Published on: May 22, 2017

    14.4K
    Implementing Dynamic Clamp with Synaptic and Artificial Conductances in Mouse Retinal Ganglion Cells
    11:46

    Implementing Dynamic Clamp with Synaptic and Artificial Conductances in Mouse Retinal Ganglion Cells

    Published on: May 16, 2013

    12.8K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Feb 2, 2026

    An Isolated Retinal Preparation to Record Light Response from Genetically Labeled Retinal Ganglion Cells
    13:02

    An Isolated Retinal Preparation to Record Light Response from Genetically Labeled Retinal Ganglion Cells

    Published on: January 26, 2011

    17.3K
    Single-cell RNA-Seq of Defined Subsets of Retinal Ganglion Cells
    11:26

    Single-cell RNA-Seq of Defined Subsets of Retinal Ganglion Cells

    Published on: May 22, 2017

    14.4K
    Implementing Dynamic Clamp with Synaptic and Artificial Conductances in Mouse Retinal Ganglion Cells
    11:46

    Implementing Dynamic Clamp with Synaptic and Artificial Conductances in Mouse Retinal Ganglion Cells

    Published on: May 16, 2013

    12.8K

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Biomedical Engineering
    • Machine Learning

    Background:

    • Retinal prostheses aim to restore vision by electrically stimulating surviving retinal neurons.
    • Understanding neuronal responses to electrical stimulation is crucial for improving retinal implant efficacy.
    • Existing classifications of retinal ganglion cells include morphological (A, B, C, D) and functional (ON, OFF, ON-OFF) types.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate if electrophysiological properties of retinal ganglion cells can be used to classify them.
    • To determine if machine learning can identify distinct neuronal clusters based on electrophysiological data.
    • To compare machine learning-derived clusters with established neuroscientific classifications.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilized previously recorded patch clamp data from retinal ganglion cells.
    • Applied a machine learning technique to cluster cells based on electrophysiological parameters.
    • Compared the resulting clusters with known morphological and functional cell classifications.

    Main Results:

    • Machine learning successfully clustered retinal ganglion cells based on their electrophysiological properties.
    • The identified electrophysiological clusters did not correspond to the traditional morphological classes (A, B, C, D).
    • The discovered clusters also did not align with the functional classifications (ON, OFF, ON-OFF).

    Conclusions:

    • Electrophysiological properties offer a distinct way to classify retinal ganglion cells, separate from morphology and function.
    • Current neuroscientific classifications may not fully capture the response patterns relevant to electrical stimulation for retinal prostheses.
    • Further research is needed to integrate these findings for optimized retinal implant design and function.