Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Deciphering the Structural Effects of Activating EGFR Somatic Mutations with Molecular Dynamics Simulation
Published on: May 20, 2020
Computational analysis reveals histotype-dependent molecular profile and actionable mutation effects across cancers
Daniel Heim1, Grégoire Montavon2, Peter Hufnagl1
1Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
This study introduces a computational method to analyze how cancer mutations affect protein profiles across different cancer types. The approach identifies cross-cancer mutation effects, aiding in targeted therapy development and basket trial design.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genomics
- Proteomics
- Computational Biology
Background:
- Comprehensive mutational profiling is driving new molecular tumor classifications beyond traditional histology.
- Molecular classifications aim to predict therapy response based on genetic alterations.
- Basket trials test targeted therapies across histotypes based on specific mutations, with variable success.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a computational approach for analyzing the histological context dependency of mutational effects.
- To integrate genomic and proteomic tumor profiles across diverse cancer types.
- To systematically identify proteins characteristic of oncogenic mutation effects.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the energy distance to compare protein profiles in tumors with and without oncogenic mutations.
- Employed Monte Carlo simulations for statistical significance analysis.
- Ranked proteins by their contribution to profile differences to identify mutation-specific markers.
Main Results:
- Applied the approach to four molecular classification proposals and 12 actionable genes.
- Observed protein-level effects for all evaluated actionable genes in corresponding tumor types.
- Identified consistent cross-cancer protein profile effects for 4 genes (FGFR1, ERRB2, IDH1, KRAS/NRAS) in 14 tumor types.
- Validated findings using cell line drug response data.
Conclusions:
- The computational approach can identify mutational signatures with protein-level effects.
- Supports preclinical in silico testing of molecular classifications and mutation druggability.
- Facilitates the identification of novel, cross-cancer targeted therapies.
- Guides efficient design of basket trials for targeted cancer treatments.
Related Concept Videos
Mutations
Mutations
Chromosomal Alterations Are Large-Scale Mutations
While point mutations are changes in a single nucleotide in...
Cancers Originate from Somatic Mutations in a Single Cell
Viral Mutations
Surface Tension, Capillary Action, and Viscosity
The various IMFs between identical molecules of a substance are examples of cohesive forces. The molecules within a liquid are surrounded by other molecules and are attracted equally in all directions by the cohesive forces within the liquid. However, the molecules on the surface of a liquid are attracted only by about one-half as many molecules. Because of the unbalanced molecular attractions on the surface molecules, liquids contract to form a shape that minimizes the number...
Real Gases: Effects of Intermolecular Forces and Molecular Volume Deriving Van der Waals Equation

