Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
Published on: June 30, 2014
Preliminary Validation of the Digital Ulcer Clinical Assessment Score in Systemic Sclerosis
Cosimo Bruni1,2,3, Tanaka Ngcozana4,5,6, Francesca Braschi4,5,6
1From the Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, and Department of Public Health, University of Florence; Department of Geriatric Medicine, Division of Rheumatology Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (AOUC), Florence, Italy; the Centre for Rheumatology and Connective Tissue Diseases, University College London (UCL), Division of Medicine, London, UK; Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Department, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt; Department of Rheumatology, Institute for Research and Health Care (IRCCS) Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy; Department of Medicine Statistics Core, and Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA. cosimobruni85@gmail.com.
Objective:
To date, "healed/non-healed" and clinical judgment are the only available assessment tools for digital ulcers (DU) in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). The aim of our study is to examine a preliminary composite DU clinical assessment score (DUCAS) for SSc for face, content, and construct validity.
Methods:
Patients with SSc presenting at least 1 finger DU were enrolled and assessed with the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, Cochin scale, visual analog scale (VAS) for DU-related pain, patient global DU status, and global assessment as patient-reported outcomes (PRO), and physician VAS for DU status (phyGDU) as an SSc-DU expert physician/nurse measure. The DUCAS included 7 DU-related variables selected by a committee of SSc DU experts and weighted on a clinical basis. Face validity was examined by consensus and partial construct validity was tested through convergent correlation with other measures of hand function, using Spearman's correlations. A range of patients with SSc was examined. A linear regression model with backward stepwise analysis was used to determine the relationship of individual variables with the primary clinical parameter, phyGDU.
Results:
Forty-four patients with SSc (9 males, mean age 55 ± 15 yrs, mean disease duration 9.9 ± 5.8 yrs) were enrolled in the study. Overall DUCAS showed significant positive correlations with all abovementioned PRO (r > 0.4, p < 0.01). When all scores and scales were modeled, only DUCAS significantly predicted phyGDU (r = 0.59, R2 = 0.354, Akaike information criterion = 385.4).
Conclusion:
Preliminarily, we suggest that the DUCAS may be a new clinical score for SSc-related DU, having face and content validity and convergent/divergent correlations (construct validity). These early data suggest that this score deserves further evaluation.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Introduction to z Scores
z scores...
Introduction to z Scores
z scores...
z Scores and Area Under the Curve
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment

