Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Author Spotlight: Development of a Minimally Invasive Large-Animal Model for Reliable and Reproducible Cardiovascular Research
Published on: October 20, 2023
Relationship Between Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Mortality in Asymptomatic and Minimally Symptomatic
Yohann Bohbot1, Christophe de Meester de Ravenstein2, Gagandeep Chadha1
1Department of Cardiology, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Insights
A left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below 55% indicates poor prognosis in severe aortic stenosis patients with preserved LVEF. Early surgical intervention is recommended before LVEF drops below this threshold.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Echocardiography
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Severe aortic stenosis (AS) with preserved LVEF (≥50%) is uncommon.
- Current guidelines recommend aortic valve replacement (AVR) for LVEF <50%, but data on LVEF thresholds in preserved LVEF are lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify the optimal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) cutoff for predicting long-term mortality in severe AS patients with preserved LVEF.
- To evaluate the prognostic value of LVEF in patients managed conservatively or surgically.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 1,678 patients with severe AS and preserved LVEF.
- Patients were stratified into three groups based on LVEF: <55%, 55%-59%, and ≥60%.
Main Results:
- Five-year survival rates were significantly lower for patients with LVEF <55% (59 ± 4%) compared to LVEF ≥60% (72 ± 2%).
- LVEF <55% was associated with significantly increased mortality under both conservative and surgical management.
- Patients with LVEF 55%-59% had a similar prognosis to those with LVEF ≥60%.
Conclusions:
- A left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below 55% is a marker of poor prognosis in severe AS patients with preserved LVEF.
- These findings suggest considering surgical intervention before LVEF declines below 55% in this patient group.
Objectives:
This study sought to determine the best left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) cutoff value to predict long-term mortality in patients with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) and LVEF ≥50% under conservative management and after surgical correction of AS.
Background:
Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is a Class I indication in asymptomatic patients with severe AS and LVEF <50%. However, this is an uncommon situation in asymptomatic severe AS (<1% of patients), usually occurring late in the course of the disease. No data are available concerning the prognostic value of LVEF in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic AS patients with preserved LVEF (≥50%) in order to identify a LVEF threshold value associated with increased mortality.
Methods:
This analysis included 1,678 patients with preserved LVEF and no or minimal symptoms, with a diagnosis of severe AS. The population was divided into 3 groups: LVEF <55%, LVEF 55% to 59%, and LVEF ≥60%.
Results:
Five-year survival rate was 72 ± 2% for patients with LVEF ≥60%, 74 ± 2% for patients with LVEF between 55% and 59%, and 59 ± 4% for patients with LVEF <55% (p < 0.001). Under initially conservative or initially surgical management (surgery within 3 months after baseline echocardiography), patients with LVEF <55% displayed significant excess mortality compared to patients with LVEF≥ 60% (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 2.44 [95% confidence interval: 1.51 to 3.94]; p < 0.001 and 2.51 [95% confidence interval: 1.58 to 4.00]; p < 0.001, respectively), whereas patients with LVEF between 55% and 59% had comparable prognosis to those with LVEF ≥60% (p = 0.53 and p = 0.36, respectively). In patients with LVEF <55%, initial conservative management was associated with increased mortality compared to initial surgical management, even after covariate adjustment (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 2.70 [95% confidence interval: 1.98 to 3.67]; p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
In patients with severe AS, preserved LVEF and no or minimal symptoms at the time of diagnosis, LVEF <55% is a marker of poor outcome, with medical or surgical management suggesting that these patients should be considered for surgery before this stage.
Related Concept Videos
Relationship Formation
Ending Relationships
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Relationship Growth
Social Relationships and Well-Being
Partial Fractions

