Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Remote Limb Ischemic Preconditioning: A Neuroprotective Technique in Rodents
Published on: June 2, 2015
Impact of remote ischemic preconditioning preceding coronary artery bypass grafting on inducing neuroprotection
Hrvoje Gasparovic1, Tomislav Kopjar1, Milan Rados2
1Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Center Zagreb, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Insights
Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) did not prevent neurological complications after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, RIPC significantly reduced the volume of ischemic brain lesions, suggesting a potential neuroprotective benefit.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Neurology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Neurological complications following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are a significant concern, impacting patient outcomes and healthcare costs.
- The incidence of these complications is rising due to an aging patient population with increased comorbidities.
- Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is being investigated as a potential strategy for neuroprotection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) in preventing neurological complications after CABG.
- To assess the impact of RIPC on brain lesions, neurocognitive function, and brain connectivity.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving 70 patients undergoing first-time CABG.
- Patients were assigned to either RIPC or a sham procedure.
- Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including functional connectivity MRI, and neurocognitive tests were performed pre- and postoperatively.
Main Results:
- No significant difference was observed in the primary outcome (composite of ischemic brain lesions and neurocognitive impairment) between the RIPC and control groups.
- RIPC significantly reduced the pooled volume of ischemic brain lesions (157 mm³ vs 777 mm³).
- While neurocognitive test scores were marginally better in the RIPC group, this did not reach statistical significance. Both groups showed reduced functional connectivity in the associative thalamus.
Conclusions:
- RIPC did not reduce the incidence of primary neurological outcomes after CABG.
- RIPC demonstrated a significant reduction in the volume of silent ischemic brain lesions.
- RIPC did not provide demonstrable protection against adverse effects on global brain connectivity following surgery.
Background:
Neurological complications after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) reduce quality of life, increase mortality, and inflate resource utilization. The risk of postoperative neurological complications parallels the increasing risk burden of the contemporary patient population. We evaluated the efficacy of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on inducing neuroprotection.
Methods:
Seventy patients undergoing first-time CABG were randomly assigned to RIPC or a sham procedure. Structural brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was complemented with functional connectivity MRI to gain a whole-brain global connectivity analysis. Paired neurocognitive and MRI data were acquired pre- and postoperatively. The primary end point was a composite of new ischemic brain lesions and neurocognitive impairment. Secondary end points included brain connectivity profiles, pooled ischemic volumes, and individual components of the primary outcome. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to determine whether a data set followed a normal distribution. The Fisher exact test was used to calculate the measures of association for categorical variables, whereas continuous data were tested with either the Mann-Whitney U test or the Student t test.
Results:
There was no between-group difference in the incidence of the primary end point (9 [27%] in the RIPC group vs 8 [24%] in the control group, odds ratio, 1.17 [95% confidence interval, 0.34-4.06]; P = 1.0). Although RIPC did not reduce the incidence of brain ischemia (8/33 [24%] vs 7/33 [21%]; P = 1.0), the pooled ischemic volume was lower in the RIPC group (157 [interquartile range, 125-231] vs 777 [interquartile range, 564-965] mm3; P = .004). Postoperative neurocognition was marginally superior in the RIPC group as evidenced by a lower absolute number of abnormal neurocognitive tests in the RIPC group (7/99 [7%] vs 16/99 [16%]; odds ratio, 0.40 [95% confidence interval, 0.14-1.09]; P = .074). Robust reductions of functional connectivity profiles for the associative thalamus were documented in both groups, irrespective of RIPC (RIPC group, t = 3.31; P < .01; and the control group, t = 3.52; P < .01).
Conclusions:
Silent brain ischemia occurs frequently after CABG. RIPC did not reduce the incidence of the primary outcome. However, RIPC significantly reduced the pooled volume of ischemic brain lesions. Surgery adversely affected global brain connectivity, with RIPC conferring no demonstrable protection. The association of RIPC with superior neurocognitive test scores failed to cross the threshold for significance.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Impact of Groups on Groups

