Neuropsychological comparison of incident MCI and prevalent MCI

Allison Hansen1, Richard J Caselli2, Gretchen Schlosser-Covell2

  • 1Translational Neuroscience and Aging Program, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.

Abstract

Insights

Patients diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in clinical settings (prevalent MCI) show worse cognitive function than those diagnosed in research (incident MCI). This highlights the need to differentiate between prevalent and incident MCI in studies.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Gerontology

Background:

  • Limited research exists on cognitive differences between mild cognitive impairment (MCI) diagnosed in clinical (prevalent) versus research (incident) settings.
  • Alzheimer's disease progression suggests potential distinctions between these MCI classifications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and compare the cognitive performance of prevalent MCI patients versus incident MCI patients.
  • To determine if MCI severity differs based on diagnostic setting.

Main Methods:

  • A comparison was made between 52 prevalent amnestic MCI patients and 53 incident amnestic MCI participants.
  • Neuropsychological data across four cognitive domains and one global measure were analyzed.

Main Results:

  • Prevalent MCI cases demonstrated significantly poorer performance compared to incident MCI cases.
  • This difference was observed in both global cognitive function and specific domain measures.

Conclusions:

  • Patients seeking clinical evaluation for memory loss present with more severe single-domain amnestic MCI than research-identified incident MCI cases.
  • Future studies on MCI should differentiate between incident and prevalent cases, in addition to single- and multiple-domain classifications.

Related Concept Videos

Prevalence and Incidence01:08

Prevalence and Incidence

In statistical epidemiology and health sciences, two essential metrics—prevalence and incidence—are fundamental for understanding disease dynamics within a population. These measures enable public health officials, epidemiologists, and researchers to assess the burden of diseases, allocate resources effectively, and design impactful public health policies and interventions.
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health...
1.9K
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison02:57

The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison

According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
56.1K
Types of Reports II: Incident or Occurrence Report01:21

Types of Reports II: Incident or Occurrence Report

An Incident or Occurrence Report in a healthcare setting is a crucial document used to record any unexpected occurrence that may or may not have affected a patient, employee, or visitor. Such reports are critical to improving patient safety and include all details leading up to and including the event.
Purposes:
In the healthcare industry, reports play a crucial role in documenting incidents within an agency. The primary objective of these reports is to ensure patient safety, uphold the...
1.3K
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.5K
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
7.0K
Comparison Between Electrical And Gravitational Forces01:24

Comparison Between Electrical And Gravitational Forces

There are four fundamental forces in nature: the gravitational force, the electromagnetic force, the strong nuclear force, and the weak nuclear force. To compare the numerical strengths of the first two, take two particles of the same kind. Since electrons are fundamental particles, they are a good example.
Since both are inverse square law forces, the distance gets canceled when the ratio of the two forces is considered. Instead, the ratio of the electrical and gravitational forces depends on...
4.1K