Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Programmed Electrical Stimulation in Mice
Published on: May 26, 2010
Difference in Speech Recognition between a Default and Programmed Telecoil Program
Kimberly T Ledda1, Michael Valente1, Kristi Oeding1
1Division of Adult Audiology, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Programming hearing aid telecoils to match microphone frequency response significantly improves speech recognition for individuals with hearing loss. This enhancement, especially with male talkers, offers clearer telephone communication and reduces social isolation.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Speech-Language Pathology
- Hearing Aid Technology
Background:
- Hearing loss can lead to social isolation, with telephone use often hindered by technical limitations.
- Telecoils can improve signal clarity, but research on optimizing their frequency response is limited.
- Matching telecoil frequency response to microphone targets (like NAL-NL1) may enhance telephone communication for hearing aid users.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if programming hearing aid telecoils improves speech recognition compared to default settings.
- To assess speech recognition differences between male and female talkers in different telecoil conditions.
- To evaluate speech recognition for sentences and monosyllabic words using programmed versus default telecoils.
Main Methods:
- A single-blinded randomized controlled trial involving 20 hearing aid users and 10 normal-hearing participants.
- Hearing aids were programmed to NAL-NL1 targets, with one telecoil set to default and another programmed to match microphone frequency response.
- Speech recognition was measured using AZ-BIO sentences and CNC words with both telecoil programs.
Main Results:
- The programmed telecoil condition showed significantly improved overall speech recognition compared to the default telecoil (p < 0.001).
- Speech recognition was significantly better with a male talker compared to a female talker (p < 0.001).
- Performance with sentences was superior to monosyllabic words and phonemes in both telecoil conditions (p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
- Programming hearing aid telecoils to match microphone frequency response significantly enhances speech recognition.
- This optimized telecoil setting benefits all tested speech stimuli (sentences, monosyllables, phonemes).
- Male talkers further improved speech recognition outcomes in both telecoil conditions.
Related Concept Videos
Electric Potential and Potential Difference
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test
Sum and Difference OpAmps
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...
Difference Equation Solution using z-Transform
The z-transform facilitates handling delayed signals by shifting the signal in the z-domain, which corresponds to delaying the signal in the time domain, and advancing signals by similarly shifting in the...
Hearing

