Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

8.4K
In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.4K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

11.3K
Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
11.3K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.9K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.9K
Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

13.3K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
13.3K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.5K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.5K
Rate-Determining Steps03:08

Rate-Determining Steps

37.1K
Relating Reaction Mechanisms
In a multistep reaction mechanism, one of the elementary steps progresses significantly slower than the others. This slowest step is called the rate-limiting step (or rate-determining step). A reaction cannot proceed faster than its slowest step, and hence, the rate-determining step limits the overall reaction rate.
The concept of rate-determining step can be understood from the analogy of a 4-lane freeway with a short-stretch of traffic-bottleneck caused due to...
37.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Developing school psychologists as agents of social justice: a qualitative analysis of student understanding across three years.

Journal of school psychology·2014
Same author

Lymphatic vascular response to acute inflammation.

PloS one·2013
Same author

Quantifying multimodal contrast agent biological activity using near-infrared flow cytometry.

Contrast media & molecular imaging·2012
Same journal

The overlooked role of internalizing symptoms in adolescent executive function: Insights from self- and teacher ratings.

Journal of school psychology·2026
Same journal

How do schools support students after a behavioral threat assessment?

Journal of school psychology·2026
Same journal

The roles of parent and teacher support in students' academic development: Do associations change over the course of adolescence or is support always important for all students?

Journal of school psychology·2026
Same journal

Pragmatic measures for school-based research and practice: Best practices and future directions.

Journal of school psychology·2026
Same journal

Pragmatic measurement of mechanisms: Does use of coping strategies mediate the effects of a teacher stress intervention?

Journal of school psychology·2026
Same journal

Beyond the individual: Latent growth patterns of schoolwide bullying perpetration, traditional victimization, and cyber victimization in relation to social and emotional learning.

Journal of school psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Author Spotlight: Learning Systematic Bronchoscopy in a Simulation-Base Setting
04:47

Author Spotlight: Learning Systematic Bronchoscopy in a Simulation-Base Setting

Published on: June 23, 2023

3.5K

A systematic review of the Second Step program.

Gregory E Moy1, Amy Hazen1

  • 1Seattle University, 901 12th Ave., Seattle, WA 98122, USA.

Journal of School Psychology
|November 23, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Second Step social emotional learning program boosts student knowledge and prosocial behavior. However, it did not significantly impact antisocial outcomes, with potential publication bias noted for knowledge results.

Keywords:
Meta-analysisPublication biasSecond StepSocial emotional learning

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Demonstrating Systematic Endobronchial Ultrasound to New Endoscopists
05:22

Author Spotlight: Demonstrating Systematic Endobronchial Ultrasound to New Endoscopists

Published on: August 11, 2023

2.8K
Programmed Electrical Stimulation in Mice
07:29

Programmed Electrical Stimulation in Mice

Published on: May 26, 2010

21.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Author Spotlight: Learning Systematic Bronchoscopy in a Simulation-Base Setting
04:47

Author Spotlight: Learning Systematic Bronchoscopy in a Simulation-Base Setting

Published on: June 23, 2023

3.5K
Author Spotlight: Demonstrating Systematic Endobronchial Ultrasound to New Endoscopists
05:22

Author Spotlight: Demonstrating Systematic Endobronchial Ultrasound to New Endoscopists

Published on: August 11, 2023

2.8K
Programmed Electrical Stimulation in Mice
07:29

Programmed Electrical Stimulation in Mice

Published on: May 26, 2010

21.3K

Area of Science:

  • Education
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Social emotional learning (SEL) programs are increasingly implemented in educational settings.
  • The Second Step program is a widely used SEL curriculum.
  • Evaluating the effectiveness of SEL programs is crucial for evidence-based decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To conduct a meta-analysis of research studies on the Second Step program.
  • To examine the program's impact on students' social emotional learning knowledge, prosocial, and antisocial outcomes.
  • To assess potential publication bias in the existing literature.

Main Methods:

  • Meta-analysis of 24 primary research studies.
  • Inclusion of randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, and single-group repeated measures designs.
  • Categorization of outcomes into program content knowledge, prosociality, and antisociality.

Main Results:

  • Students participating in the Second Step program showed increased knowledge of program content.
  • Significant positive effects were observed for prosocial outcomes.
  • No significant changes were found in antisocial outcomes.
  • Potential publication bias was identified for knowledge outcomes, but not for prosocial or antisocial outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • The Second Step program effectively enhances social emotional learning knowledge and promotes prosocial behaviors in students.
  • The program's impact on reducing antisocial behaviors requires further investigation.
  • Findings can inform educational policy and practice regarding SEL program implementation.