Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Cefoperazone-treated Mouse Model of Clinically-relevant Clostridium difficile Strain R20291
Published on: December 10, 2016
Toxin B PCR Amplification Cycle Threshold Adds Little to Clinical Variables for Predicting Outcomes in Clostridium
Julia Origüen1, María Ángeles Orellana2, Mario Fernández-Ruiz3
1Unit of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre," Instituto de Investigación Hospital "12 de Octubre" (i+12), School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain josabater@hotmail.com.
Abstract:
The objective of the present study was to evaluate the value of the PCR cycle threshold (C ) for predicting the recurrence/severity of infection compared to that of toxin detection plus clinical variables. First episodes of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) diagnosed during 2015 at our institution were included. Samples were tested for glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and toxin A/B by use of a single enzyme immunoassay (EIA). The Xpert C. difficile PCR assay was performed on GDH-positive samples. Medical data were reviewed by investigators blinded to diagnostic results for comparison of patients with and without recurrence or a poor outcome (severe/severe-complicated CDI episodes and all-cause death). We generated two sets of predictive models by incorporating the presence of a positive toxin EIA ("EIA-including model") or the optimal PCR C cutoff value ("PCR-including model") into the clinical variables. Among 227 episodes of CDI included in the study, the rates of recurrence and poor outcome were 15.8% and 30.8%, respectively. The mean PCR C was lower for episodes with recurrence (24.00 ± 3.28 versus 26.02 ± 4.54; P = 0.002) or a poor outcome (24.9 ± 4.24 versus 26.05 ± 4.47; P = 0.07). The optimal cutoff value for recurrence was 25.65 (sensitivity, 77.8% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 60.9 to 89.9]; and specificity, 46.6% [95% CI, 39.4 to 53.9]). The area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (auROC) for the "PCR-including model" was similar to that for the "EIA-including model" (0.785 versus 0.775, respectively). The optimal PCR C value for poor outcome was 27.55 (sensitivity, 78.6% [95% CI, 67.1 to 87.5]; and specificity, 35.7% [95% CI, 28.2 to 43.7]). The auROC of the "PCR-including model" was again similar to that of the "EIA-including model" (0.804 versus 0.801). Despite the inverse correlation between PCR C and the risk of CDI recurrence/severity, this determination does not meaningfully increase the predictive value of clinical variables plus toxin EIA.
Insights
The PCR cycle threshold (Ct) value does not significantly improve the prediction of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) recurrence or severity when combined with clinical data and toxin detection. While lower Ct values correlate with higher risk, they offer minimal added predictive value over existing methods.
Area of Science:
- Medical Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Diagnostic Assays
Background:
- Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) poses a significant healthcare challenge, with recurrence and severity impacting patient outcomes.
- Accurate prediction of CDI recurrence and severity is crucial for timely and effective patient management.
- Current diagnostic methods include toxin detection and clinical variables, but their predictive power for outcomes can be limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the predictive value of the PCR cycle threshold (Ct) for CDI recurrence and severity.
- To compare the predictive performance of PCR Ct values against toxin detection and clinical variables.
- To determine if incorporating PCR Ct values into predictive models enhances diagnostic accuracy for CDI outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study included first episodes of CDI diagnosed in 2015.
- Samples were tested using enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for GDH and toxin A/B, and Xpert C. difficile PCR assay.
- Predictive models were developed incorporating either EIA results or PCR Ct values alongside clinical variables.
Main Results:
- The mean PCR Ct was lower in episodes with recurrence or poor outcome, indicating an inverse correlation.
- The optimal PCR Ct cutoff for recurrence was 25.65, and for poor outcome was 27.55.
- Predictive models including PCR Ct values showed similar performance (auROC) to models including EIA results when combined with clinical variables.
Conclusions:
- The PCR Ct value, despite its correlation with CDI recurrence and severity, does not substantially increase the predictive value of existing diagnostic approaches.
- Toxin detection combined with clinical variables remains a robust method for predicting CDI outcomes.
- Further research may explore novel biomarkers or refined models for improved prediction of CDI recurrence and severity.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
PCR
Endocarditis II: Clinical Features of Infective Endocarditis
Types of Toxins
Air pollutants, primarily gases, pose significant threats to respiratory health, leading to conditions like hypoxia, lung cancer, and in extreme cases, death.
Environmental pollutants like...
Lytic Cycle of Bacteriophages
Predicting Molecular Geometry

