Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity
Published on: March 7, 2019
Are patient-reported outcomes of physical function a valid substitute for objective measurements?
J A J Douma1, H M W Verheul1, L M Buffart1,2
1Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Patient-reported physical function outcomes are weakly associated with objective measures in cancer survivors. These patient-reported outcomes cannot replace objective tests for assessing physical function in clinical practice.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Exercise Physiology
Background:
- Physical function is crucial for cancer treatment strategies and can be assessed via patient-reported outcomes (PROs).
- Objective measures of physical activity and fitness exist but are labor-intensive and rarely used clinically.
- This study investigates the accuracy of PROs for physical function (PRO-PF) against objective measures in cancer patients post-treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if PROs for physical function accurately predict objective physical function.
- To examine the interrelationships between PRO-PF, physical activity, and cardiorespiratory fitness in cancer survivors.
- To assess the clinical utility of PRO-PF as a substitute for objective physical function assessments.
Main Methods:
- Utilized baseline data from the REACT and EXIST studies involving cancer patients post-chemotherapy or stem-cell transplantation.
- Assessed interrelationships between PRO-PF (EORTC QLQ-C30 physical function subscale), physical activity (accelerometer), and cardiorespiratory fitness (peak oxygen uptake).
- Employed univariable and multivariable linear mixed-effects models, adjusting for age, sex, and BMI.
Main Results:
- PRO-PF showed a significant but weak association with objective physical activity (β = 1.75) and cardiorespiratory fitness (β = 0.10) after adjustments.
- Standardized coefficients (0.28 for physical activity, 0.26 for fitness) indicate a weak predictive relationship.
- The findings suggest limited concordance between subjective and objective physical function assessments.
Conclusions:
- Patient-reported physical function outcomes demonstrate a weak correlation with objective measures of physical activity and fitness in cancer survivors.
- PRO-PF is not a reliable substitute for objective physical function assessments in clinical practice for this population.
- Objective evaluation of physical activity and fitness remains essential for comprehensive assessment in cancer rehabilitation.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Data Reporting and Recording
Physical and Chemical Properties of Matter
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Trigonometric Substitution
Rationalizing Substitutions

