Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process
Published on: June 21, 2024
Cochlear Implant in Prelingually Deaf Children: Our Experience
Vikram Kulkarni1, Shivkumar Raghuwanshi2, Ajit Kumar1
1Department of Ent and Head and Neck Surgery, L N Medical College and J K Hospital, Bhopal, MP India.
Insights
Early cochlear implantation (CI) before age 4 in prelingually deaf children significantly improves speech-language outcomes. Government-funded CI programs should prioritize early identification and intervention for better results.
Area of Science:
- Otolaryngology
- Pediatric Audiology
- Speech-Language Pathology
Background:
- Prelingual deafness significantly impacts speech and language development.
- Cochlear implantation (CI) is a crucial intervention for severe to profound hearing loss.
- Government-funded programs aim to provide CI access to underserved populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the outcomes of a government-funded prelingual cochlear implantation program in Central India.
- To compare the effectiveness of CI in children younger than 4 years versus those older than 4 years.
- To identify factors influencing speech and language development post-CI.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 42 prelingually deaf children who underwent CI between March 2015 and February 2018.
- Analysis of patient demographics, pre-implantation hearing aid use, surgical techniques, and CI device type.
- Assessment of post-operative speech therapy outcomes using Categories of Auditory Perception (CAP) and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scores.
- Non-parametric statistical methods were used for group comparisons.
Main Results:
- Children aged 2-7 years received CI, with both varia and mastoidectomy/posterior tympanotomy surgical techniques employed successfully.
- Complete electrode insertion and activation rates were high.
- No significant difference in CAP and SIR outcomes was observed between children implanted before and after 4 years of age at the 1-year follow-up.
Conclusions:
- While surgical outcomes were favorable, the study highlights the critical need for earlier identification and CI intervention before 4 years of age for optimal speech-language development.
- Strengthening early identification and CI services within government schemes is essential for maximizing developmental potential in prelingually deaf children.
Abstract:
Retrospective study of the prelingual cochlear implantation programme under government scheme done at medical college hospital in central India. Forty-two prelingually deaf children screened and sent for cochlear implantation at our centre From March 2015 to Feb 2018 were reviewed with respect to their age, sex, preimplantation hearing aid use, surgical technique for cochlear implantation, type of FDA (USA) approved cochlear implant, post operative speech therapy and its outcome with respect to categories of auditory perception and speech intelligibility scoring were compared for children younger than 4 years and older than 4 years. For outcome measurement non parametric statistical method was used for any significance between the two groups. There was a wide range of children implanted ranging from 2 to 7 years. Both varia and mastoidectomy and posterior tympanotomy method of cochlear implantations were done with good rate complete insertion and electrode activation. There was no significant difference between the two group with regard to CAP and SIR outcomes after 1 year. In order to get better outcomes with respect to the speech language development, there is need to strengthen the early identification and cochlear implantation before 4 years of age in government approved schemes.
Related Concept Videos
What is an Experiment?
Thomson's e/m Experiment
A particle with charge q, speed v, and mass m enters an area from the top, where the magnetic and electric fields are perpendicular both to the particle's motion and to one another. The magnetic...
Controls in Experiments
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
The Stanford Prison Experiment

