Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Vector Algebra: Method of Components01:08

Vector Algebra: Method of Components

19.5K
It is cumbersome to find the magnitudes of vectors using the parallelogram rule or using the graphical method to perform mathematical operations like addition, subtraction, and multiplication. There are two ways to circumvent this algebraic complexity. One way is to draw the vectors to scale, as in navigation, and read approximate vector lengths and angles (directions) from the graphs. The other way is to use the method of components.
In many applications, the magnitudes and directions of...
19.5K
Anatomy of the Intestines01:23

Anatomy of the Intestines

87.4K
Although digestion of proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids may begin in the stomach, it is completed in the intestine. The absorption of nutrients, water, and electrolytes from food and drink also occurs in the intestine. The intestines can be divided into two structurally distinct organs—the small and large intestines.
Small Intestines
The small intestine is an ~7 meter-long tube with an inner diameter of just 2.5 cm. Since most nutrients are absorbed here, the inner lining of the...
87.4K
Diversity of Archaea I01:30

Diversity of Archaea I

628
Archaea, a domain of single-celled microorganisms, are classified into five major phyla based on genetic and biochemical characteristics: Euryarchaeota, Crenarchaeota, Thaumarchaeota, Korarchaeota, and Nanoarchaeota. Among these, the phylum Euryarchaeota is notable for its remarkable diversity in morphology, metabolism, and ecological adaptations.Morphological and Metabolic DiversityMembers of Euryarchaeota exhibit a variety of cellular shapes, including rods and cocci. Their metabolic pathways...
628
Cell Diversity01:13

Cell Diversity

5.1K
The concept of a cell started with microscopic observations of dead cork tissue by Robert Hooke in 1665. Hooke coined the term "cell" based on the resemblance of the small subdivisions in the cork to the rooms that monks inhabited, called cells. About ten years later, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek became the first person to observe the living and moving cells under a microscope. In the century that followed, the theory that cells represented the basic unit of life developed.
Multicellular...
5.1K
Diversity of Archaea II01:24

Diversity of Archaea II

524
Archaea, one of the three domains of life, exhibit remarkable diversity and adaptability, thriving in both extreme and moderate environments. Historically, most identified archaea have been classified into two major phyla: Euryarchaeota and Crenarchaeota. However, recent molecular studies have expanded this classification to include three additional phyla: Thaumarchaeota, Nanoarchaeota, and Korarchaeota, each exhibiting unique characteristics and ecological roles.Thaumarchaeota: Mesophiles...
524
Diversity of Protists I01:15

Diversity of Protists I

1.2K
Excavata is a diverse group of protists that includes both chemoorganotrophic and phototrophic species, with some thriving in anaerobic environments. Among the key groups within Excavata are diplomonads and parabasalids, which are flagellated protists that lack mitochondria and chloroplasts. These microorganisms typically inhabit anoxic environments, such as the intestines of animals, where they exist either symbiotically or as parasites, relying on fermentation for energy production. Some...
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Surface substance loss of subsurface bovine enamel lesions after different steps of the resinous infiltration technique: a 3D topography analysis.

Odontology·2011
Same author

Expression of IL-23/Th17 pathway in a murine model of Coxsackie virus B3-induced viral myocarditis.

Virology journal·2011
Same author

Extracellular matrix peptides of Artemia cyst shell participate in protecting encysted embryos from extreme environments.

PloS one·2011
Same author

Therapeutic effect of carboxymethylated and quanternized chitosan on insulin resistance in high-fat-diet-induced rats and 3T3-L1 adipocytes.

Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition·2011
Same author

Role of reactive oxygen species in triptolide-induced apoptosis of renal tubular cells and renal injury in rats.

Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences = Hua zhong ke ji da xue xue bao. Yi xue Ying De wen ban = Huazhong keji daxue xuebao. Yixue Yingdewen ban·2011
Same author

Chlorination and ortho-acetoxylation of 2-arylbenzoxazoles.

Organic & biomolecular chemistry·2011

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 2, 2026

A Decellularization Methodology for the Production of a Natural Acellular Intestinal Matrix
08:10

A Decellularization Methodology for the Production of a Natural Acellular Intestinal Matrix

Published on: October 7, 2013

29.8K

Diverse preparation methods for small intestinal submucosa (SIS): Decellularization, components, and structure.

Yanhui Ji1,2, Jinge Zhou2, Tingfang Sun2

  • 1Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A
|November 24, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Small intestinal submucosa (SIS) extracellular matrix (ECM) is vital for tissue engineering. While decellularization methods vary, all retain biocompatibility but damage SIS microstructure and bioactive components, necessitating careful method selection for specific research goals.

Keywords:
decellularizationextracellular matrixsmall intestinal submucosa

More Related Videos

Preparation of Decellularized Kidney Scaffolds in Rats
06:09

Preparation of Decellularized Kidney Scaffolds in Rats

Published on: March 18, 2021

4.8K
Two Methods for Decellularization of Plant Tissues for Tissue Engineering Applications
05:20

Two Methods for Decellularization of Plant Tissues for Tissue Engineering Applications

Published on: May 31, 2018

15.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 2, 2026

A Decellularization Methodology for the Production of a Natural Acellular Intestinal Matrix
08:10

A Decellularization Methodology for the Production of a Natural Acellular Intestinal Matrix

Published on: October 7, 2013

29.8K
Preparation of Decellularized Kidney Scaffolds in Rats
06:09

Preparation of Decellularized Kidney Scaffolds in Rats

Published on: March 18, 2021

4.8K
Two Methods for Decellularization of Plant Tissues for Tissue Engineering Applications
05:20

Two Methods for Decellularization of Plant Tissues for Tissue Engineering Applications

Published on: May 31, 2018

15.4K

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Tissue Engineering
  • Regenerative Medicine

Background:

  • Small intestinal submucosa (SIS) extracellular matrix (ECM) is a promising biomaterial for tissue repair and regeneration.
  • Decellularization removes intrinsic cells from SIS ECM to prevent immune rejection, but methods vary.
  • Standardized criteria for SIS decellularization and understanding its biological composition are lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effects of three reported decellularization methods on SIS preparation.
  • To evaluate decellularization efficiency, remaining biological components, microstructure, and cytocompatibility of SIS.
  • To provide guidance on selecting appropriate decellularization methods for specific research applications.

Main Methods:

  • Preparation of SIS ECM using three distinct decellularization techniques.
  • Assessment of decellularization efficacy against established criteria.
  • Analysis of retained biological components, ECM microstructure, and cytocompatibility.

Main Results:

  • All three decellularization methods met recommended criteria for SIS preparation.
  • SIS ECM prepared by all methods demonstrated good biocompatibility and retained most active components.
  • Despite successful decellularization, all methods caused varying degrees of damage to SIS microstructure and bioactive components.

Conclusions:

  • SIS ECM decellularization methods achieve biocompatibility and retain key components.
  • All evaluated methods result in some degree of structural and bioactive damage to SIS.
  • Researchers should carefully select decellularization methods based on their specific research objectives and desired outcomes.