Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Community Based Intervention01:30

Community Based Intervention

482
Community-based interventions in mental health represent a paradigm shift from institution-centered care to treatments embedded within the fabric of local communities. By prioritizing inclusion and leveraging existing societal structures, this approach fosters a supportive environment conducive to addressing mental health challenges while promoting individual dignity and agency.
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
482
The Evidence for Evolution02:55

The Evidence for Evolution

48.1K
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.
48.1K
Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

8.4K
In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.4K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

11.3K
Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
11.3K
Nursing Interventions I: Taxonomy of Nursing Interventions01:03

Nursing Interventions I: Taxonomy of Nursing Interventions

3.9K
Nursing interventions are chosen as part of the planning process to achieve patient outcomes. Once nursing diagnoses are determined, the goals and outcomes are specified, then the nursing interventions are selected and individualized according to the patient's situation.
A nursing intervention is a treatment or action based on scientific concepts and knowledge from the nursing, behavioral, and physical sciences. Identifying and prioritizing nursing interventions based on the desired outcome...
3.9K
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions01:29

Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions

3.3K
Creating and executing a nursing diagnosis helps nurses plan care and guide patient, family, and community interventions. They are developed based on a patient's physical evaluation and support measuring the outcomes. It is not recommended to select random interventions throughout the planning process. Instead, consider the following six essential factors when choosing interventions:
3.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Explaining the Slow Adoption of AI Innovations in Health Care: Network Analysis Approach.

JMIR AI·2026
Same author

Individuals' Perceptions as a Substitute for Guidelines and Evidence: Interview Study Among Clinicians on How They Choose Between In-Person and Remote Consultation.

JMIR formative research·2022
Same author

Identifying the Value of an eHealth Intervention Aimed at Cognitive Impairments: Observational Study in Different Contexts and Service Models.

Journal of medical Internet research·2020
Same author

Exploring the Use of Evidence From the Development and Evaluation of an Electronic Health (eHealth) Trial: Case Study.

Journal of medical Internet research·2020
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.6K

Evidence-Based Evaluation of eHealth Interventions: Systematic Literature Review.

Amia Enam1, Johanna Torres-Bonilla1, Henrik Eriksson1

  • 1Centre for Healthcare Improvement, Technology Management and Economics, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Journal of Medical Internet Research
|November 25, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Reliable evidence for electronic health (eHealth) interventions is crucial for successful implementation. This study reveals that eHealth evaluations often occur late and incompletely, highlighting the need for comprehensive, evidence-based approaches.

Keywords:
evidence-based practiceprogram evaluationsystematic reviewtechnology assessment

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.6K

Area of Science:

  • Health Informatics
  • Digital Health Evaluation
  • Evidence-Based Healthcare

Background:

  • Electronic health (eHealth) adoption has often outpaced evidence generation.
  • A gap exists between the number of eHealth interventions and the robust evidence of their effectiveness and efficiency.
  • Comprehensive evaluation is key to accelerating eHealth growth and realizing its full benefits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To understand how to generate evidence on eHealth effectiveness and efficiency through evaluation.
  • To discern evaluation practices in distinct eHealth intervention phases.
  • To identify evaluated aspects of effectiveness and efficiency in eHealth interventions.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines.
  • Searched Google Scholar and Scopus for eHealth evaluation studies.
  • Qualitative analysis of selected published papers.

Main Results:

  • Evaluations are predominantly conducted at the end of eHealth interventions, with limited real-world examples of continuous evaluation.
  • Conceptual papers propose evaluating clinical, human/social, organizational, technological, cost, ethical/legal, and transferability aspects.
  • Reviewed case studies primarily focused on clinical and human/social aspects.

Conclusions:

  • The rigorous discussion of evidence in eHealth lags behind that of evaluation frameworks.
  • Evidence-based evaluation can enhance intervention study quality and long-term eHealth implementation.
  • Developing robust evaluation methods and validating existing ones can improve result transferability and optimize eHealth research resources.