Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026
10:52
Line Shape Analysis of Dynamic NMR Spectra for Characterizing Coordination Sphere Rearrangements at a Chiral Rhenium Polyhydride Complex
Published on: July 27, 2022
3.3K
Characterization of Dynamic IDP Complexes by NMR Spectroscopy
Andreas Prestel1, Katrine Bugge1, Lasse Staby1
1Structural Biology and NMR Laboratory, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Methods in Enzymology
|November 26, 2018
Summary
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is vital for studying intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs). This guide details advanced NMR strategies for characterizing dynamic IDP complexes, addressing challenges in their analysis.
Area of Science:
- Biochemistry
- Structural Biology
- Biophysics
Background:
- Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are crucial in cellular processes but challenging to study due to their dynamic nature.
- Traditional Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) methods are often inadequate for characterizing the complex energy landscapes of IDPs.
- IDPs are sensitive to environmental changes, requiring careful experimental design and parameter evaluation in NMR studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a guide for non-NMR experts on studying intrinsically disordered protein (IDP) complexes using NMR spectroscopy.
- To outline advanced NMR strategies beyond traditional methods for characterizing dynamic IDP complexes.
- To detail the practical aspects of NMR experiments for IDP complex analysis, including sample preparation and data interpretation.
Main Methods:
- Sample preparation techniques specific to IDP complexes.
- Recording and evaluation of diagnostic 1H,15N-HSQC spectra.
- Application of sophisticated NMR strategies tailored to different types of IDP complexes.
Main Results:
- The chapter provides a framework for selecting and applying appropriate NMR experiments for IDP complexes.
- It highlights potential pitfalls and offers guidance on analyzing NMR data to distinguish binding events from conformational changes.
- Recent examples illustrate the application and outcomes of described NMR methods.
Conclusions:
- Advanced NMR techniques are essential for a comprehensive understanding of intrinsically disordered protein (IDP) complex dynamics.
- Careful experimental design and data analysis are critical for reliable characterization of IDP complexes.
- This guide empowers researchers to effectively utilize NMR spectroscopy for studying these challenging biological molecules.
Keywords:
AffinityDynamicsFuzzyIntegrative structural biologyInteractionIntrinsically disordered proteinsLigand bindingPractical sample preparationProteinMore Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:19NMR Spectroscopy Of Amines
11.1K
In proton NMR spectroscopy, primary amines and secondary amines showcase their N–H protons as a broad signal in the chemical shift range between δ 0.5 and 5 ppm. The exact position in this range depends on several factors, including sample concentration, hydrogen bonding, and the type of solvent used. Since amine protons undergo fast proton exchange in solution, the protons are labile and therefore do not participate in any splitting with adjacent protons. Thus, the observed peak is...
11.1K
01:13¹H NMR: Complex Splitting
1.9K
A proton M that is coupled to a proton X results in doublet signals for M. However, NMR-active nuclei can be simultaneously coupled to more than one nonequivalent nucleus. When M is coupled to a second proton A, such as in styrene oxide, each peak in the doublet is split into another doublet.
Splitting diagrams or splitting tree diagrams are routinely used to depict such complex couplings. While drawing splitting diagrams, the splitting with the larger coupling constant is usually applied...
Splitting diagrams or splitting tree diagrams are routinely used to depict such complex couplings. While drawing splitting diagrams, the splitting with the larger coupling constant is usually applied...
1.9K
01:14NMR Spectroscopy of Aromatic Compounds
6.3K
Aromatic compounds can be identified or analyzed using proton NMR and carbon‐13 NMR. Typically, aromatic hydrogens or hydrogens directly bonded to the aromatic rings are strongly deshielded by the aromatic ring current. Therefore, they absorb in the range of 6.5–8.0 ppm in proton NMR spectra. For instance, aromatic hydrogens directly bonded to the benzene ring absorb at 7.3 ppm. However, aromatic hydrogens of larger rings absorb farther upfield or downfield than the ideal range.
6.3K
01:34NMR Spectroscopy of Benzene Derivatives
11.2K
Simple unsubstituted benzene has six aromatic protons, all chemically equivalent. Therefore, benzene exhibits only a singlet peak at δ 7.3 ppm in the 1H NMR spectrum. The observed shift is far downfield because the aromatic ring current strongly deshields the protons. Any substitution on the benzene ring makes the aromatic protons nonequivalent, and the protons split each other. The peak is, therefore, no longer a singlet and the splitting pattern and their associated coupling...
11.2K
01:15NMR Spectroscopy: Chemical Shift Overview
3.3K
The position of the absorption signal of a sample is reported relative to the position of the signal of tetramethylsilane (TMS), which is added as an internal reference while recording spectra. The difference between the absorption frequencies of the sample and TMS (in Hz) is divided by the spectrometer operating frequency (in MHz) to obtain a dimensionless quantity called the chemical shift. It is reported on the δ (delta) scale and expressed in parts per million.
For instance, the proton...
For instance, the proton...
3.3K
01:08NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling
3.2K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
3.2K