Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

13.9K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.9K
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

2.1K
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
2.1K
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

1.9K
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
1.9K
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

6.8K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
6.8K
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection01:26

Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection

13.5K
The hosts' susceptibility to infection depends on several factors. The integrity of the skin and mucous membranes helps protect the body against microbial attacks. When the skin is altered, the chance of infection, limb loss, and even death increases.
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
13.5K
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I01:26

Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I

3.9K
A nursing diagnosis is written when the nurse recognizes a cluster of essential patient data indicating health problems treated with independent nursing interventions. The standardized terminologies of a nursing diagnosis help nurses identify and treat patients' problems. Every electronic health record that uses nursing diagnosis must employ standard diagnostic terminology. Developing an efficient, individualized care plan begins with accurate nursing diagnoses.
There are thirteen domains...
3.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Robotic recipient liver transplantation worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the first 93 patients, from feasibility to early outcomes.

EClinicalMedicine·2026
Same author

Reply to Dion et al. Comment on "Sun et al. First Experience with Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion in Human Uteri: Feasibility and Metabolic Characterization. <i>J. Clin. Med.</i> 2026, <i>15</i>, 2820".

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

Donor obesity and MASLD as barriers to living donor liver transplantation: Institutional attrition and national outcomes.

Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society·2026
Same author

Portal-Venous Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion for Liver Transplant: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA surgery·2026
Same author

The Impact of Normothermic Machine Liver Perfusion on Early Renal Outcomes After Simultaneous Liver-kidney Transplantation: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Transplantation direct·2026
Same author

First Experience with Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion in Human Uteri: Feasibility and Metabolic Characterization.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 2, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.6K

Performance validation of the ALPPS risk model.

Michael Linecker1, Christoph Kuemmerli1, Patryk Kambakamba1

  • 1Swiss HPB and Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.

HPB : the Official Journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association
|November 28, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The validated ALPPS risk score models accurately predict 90-day mortality in patients undergoing Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS). This risk assessment aids clinical decisions to reduce early mortality after ALPPS procedures.

More Related Videos

Rat Model of the Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy ALPPS Procedure
07:29

Rat Model of the Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy ALPPS Procedure

Published on: August 14, 2017

15.5K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 2, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.6K
Rat Model of the Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy ALPPS Procedure
07:29

Rat Model of the Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy ALPPS Procedure

Published on: August 14, 2017

15.5K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.9K

Area of Science:

  • Hepatobiliary Surgery
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Clinical Risk Stratification

Background:

  • Two risk models for predicting 90-day mortality in Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) were previously proposed.
  • Validation of these predictive models was pending.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To validate two proposed risk models for predicting 90-day mortality in patients undergoing ALPPS.
  • To assess the performance of these models in an independent validation cohort.

Main Methods:

  • A validation cohort (VC) comprising 258 patients from the ALPPS registry and external centers was assembled.
  • The VC included 70 patients from centers outside the original ALPPS registry.
  • The predictive performance of the pre-stage 1 and pre-stage 2 ALPPS risk models was evaluated using c-statistics and Brier scores, comparing VC results to the development cohort (DC).

Main Results:

  • The VC confirmed the predictive capability of both models, with acceptable performance for pre-stage 1 (c-statistic 0.64) and good performance for pre-stage 2 (c-statistic 0.77).
  • Model performance in the VC was comparable to the DC, with similar Brier scores for both pre-stage 1 (0.089 vs. 0.081) and pre-stage 2 (0.079 vs. 0.087) models.
  • The validation cohort included 32 early mortalities (12%).

Conclusions:

  • The ALPPS risk score models are now fully validated for predicting individual patient risk.
  • These validated models can assist in clinical decision-making to mitigate procedure-related early mortality following ALPPS.