Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development from Childhood into Adulthood01:25

Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development from Childhood into Adulthood

Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development emphasizes the role of thinking in a child's learning process, suggesting that children are naturally curious about their environment. His approach to development is discontinuous, proposing that cognitive abilities progress through distinct stages, each with unique characteristics. Central to Piaget's theory is schemata—mental structures that allow individuals to understand and interpret the world.
Schemata: Building Blocks of Knowledge
Schemata...
Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development01:14

Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development

The sensorimotor stage, the initial phase of Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development, spans the first two years of a child's life. During this period, infants actively engage with their surroundings, building cognitive awareness through direct interaction with the world. This interaction is primarily based on sensory perception and motor actions, allowing infants to gradually understand basic physical properties and predict how objects interact within their environment.
Exploration...
Piaget's Stage 2 of Cognitive Development01:14

Piaget's Stage 2 of Cognitive Development

The preoperational stage, the second of Jean Piaget's four stages of cognitive development, spans approximately ages 2 to 7 and is characterized by the emergence of symbolic thinking. During this stage, children use language, images, and symbols to represent objects and concepts, enabling them to engage in imaginative and pretend play. This symbolic thinking supports children's ability to perform make-believe actions, such as imagining a broom as a horse or their hand as a phone, blending...
Piaget's Stage 3 of Cognitive Development01:17

Piaget's Stage 3 of Cognitive Development

During Piaget's concrete operational stage, from ages 7 to 11, children exhibit a marked increase in logical thinking skills, specifically in relation to tangible, real-world events. This stage is characterized by the development of several essential cognitive concepts, including conservation, reversibility, and classification, all of which support the child's evolving capacity for structured thought.
Conservation and Constancy of Quantity
A significant cognitive milestone in the concrete...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interoceptive autonomic regulation in typical development and autism spectrum disorder: A computational model integrating multiple physiological systems.

PloS one·2026
Same author

An Early Lexical Screening Tool for British English: Psychometric Properties and Clinical Utility.

International journal of language & communication disorders·2026
Same author

Embodied predictive processing: A unifying generative principle for cognitive development.

Advances in child development and behavior·2026
Same author

Exploring child engagement in a multi-robot tutor-peer learning scenario.

Frontiers in robotics and AI·2026
Same author

Gloves Are Hands: How English and Italian Children Label Nouns and Predicates at 24 and 30 Months in a Picture-Naming Task.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2026
Same author

Mother-child autonomic nervous system interaction as an indication of parental stress: 24-hour cross recurrence plot analysis.

PloS one·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task
11:18

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task

Published on: June 1, 2015

Children's scale errors are a natural consequence of learning to associate objects with actions: A computational

Beata J Grzyb1,2, Yukie Nagai3, Minoru Asada2

  • 1University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.

Developmental Science
|November 28, 2018
PubMed
Summary

Children make scale errors when acting on objects due to learning processes. Computational modeling shows these errors naturally occur as young children learn object-action associations, initially prioritizing shape over size.

Keywords:
action selectioncomputational modelperception-action couplingscale errors

More Related Videos

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm
06:35

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm

Published on: April 28, 2016

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
11:29

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task
11:18

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task

Published on: June 1, 2015

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm
06:35

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm

Published on: April 28, 2016

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
11:29

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Development
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Developmental Psychology

Background:

  • Young children exhibit scale errors, inappropriately acting on objects based on size.
  • Existing theories attribute scale errors to immature action planning, object representation complexity, or teleofunctional bias.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To computationally model children's learning of object-action associations and action selection.
  • To investigate the developmental origins of scale errors in children using computational methods.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a Developmental Deep Model of Action and Naming (DDMAN) based on dual-route action selection theory.
  • Emulated learning processes where the model associates objects with actions, considering both shape and size.
  • Analyzed the model's error patterns and the emergence of object-action associations during training.

Main Results:

  • The DDMAN model replicated scale errors observed in young children, with error rates decreasing over training but not vanishing.
  • The model initially organized object-action associations primarily by shape, leading to size-independent action selection.
  • With increased experience, the model learned to integrate object size into its action selection process.

Conclusions:

  • Scale errors in children are a natural outcome of the learning process for associating objects with actions.
  • Computational modeling provides insights into the developmental trajectory of action selection and error correction.
  • The findings suggest that learning to utilize object size alongside shape is a gradual developmental process.