Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Applications of Integration to Probability Density Functions01:27

Applications of Integration to Probability Density Functions

58
Continuous probability distributions are used to model random variables that can take on any real value within a specified range. These variables do not take on isolated or countable values but rather exist on a continuum. For example, the height of an individual can be measured with increasing precision—such as 163.5 or 165.25 centimeters—demonstrating that height is a continuous random variable.The behavior of such variables is described using a probability density function (PDF),...
58
Probability Laws01:49

Probability Laws

44.3K
Overview
44.3K
Probability Distributions01:32

Probability Distributions

12.1K
 The probability of a random variable x  is the likelihood of its occurrence. A probability distribution represents the probabilities of a random variable using a formula, graph, or table. There are two types of probability distribution– discrete probability distribution and continuous probability distribution.
A discrete probability distribution is a probability distribution of discrete random variables. It can be categorized into binomial probability distribution and Poisson...
12.1K
Probability in Statistics01:14

Probability in Statistics

23.4K
Probability is the likelihood of an event occurring. The term event is defined as a collection of results of a procedure. An event is a simple event when an outcome cannot be divided into simpler parts.
An example of a simple event is a coin toss. The result of a coin toss is either a head or a tail. Here, head and tail are two simple events. These two simple events make up the sample space. Further, the probability of an event occurring falls within the range of 0 to 1. The probability of an...
23.4K
Probability Histograms01:17

Probability Histograms

13.2K
A probability histogram is a visual representation of a probability distribution. Similar a typical histogram, the probability histogram consists of contiguous (adjoining) boxes. It has both a horizontal axis and a vertical axis. The horizontal axis is labeled with what the data represents. The vertical axis is labeled with probability. Each rectangular bar in the histogram is 1 unit wide, which suggests that the area under each bar equals the probability, P(x), where x is 1, 2, 3, and so on.
13.2K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.0K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multi-layered molecular profiling informs the diagnosis and targeted therapy of desmoplastic small round cell tumor.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Better Inputs, Better Learning: A Peptide Embedding Tutorial for Proteomic Mass Spectrometry.

Journal of proteome research·2026
Same author

Computational Approaches for Pathway-Centric Analysis of Protein Post-Translational Modifications.

Proteomics·2025
Same author

Proteomic analyses identify targets, pathways, and cellular consequences of oncogenic KRAS signaling.

Science signaling·2025
Same author

Pairwise Attention: Leveraging Mass Differences to Enhance De Novo Sequencing of Mass Spectra.

Journal of proteome research·2025
Same author

Open-Source and FAIR Research Software for Proteomics.

Journal of proteome research·2025
Same journal

A temporal phospho-acetylome atlas of human myogenesis identifies coordinated post-translational regulation.

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP·2026
Same journal

Temporal proteomic characterization of SARS-CoV-2 infected mouse lungs.

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP·2026
Same journal

Platelet proteome links metabolism to reactivity in Essential Thrombocythemia.

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP·2026
Same journal

Genetic rescue of disrupted synaptic protein interaction network dynamics following SYNGAP1 reactivation.

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP·2026
Same journal

ASAP-ID: Proximity labelling with small tags.

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP·2026
Same journal

Proteome profiling reveals NQO2 activity contributing to proteasome inhibitor resistance in multiple myeloma cell lines.

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 2, 2026

LERLIC-MS/MS for In-depth Characterization and Quantification of Glutamine and Asparagine Deamidation in Shotgun Proteomics
08:01

LERLIC-MS/MS for In-depth Characterization and Quantification of Glutamine and Asparagine Deamidation in Shotgun Proteomics

Published on: April 9, 2017

8.6K

Integrated Identification and Quantification Error Probabilities for Shotgun Proteomics.

Matthew The1, Lukas Käll2

  • 1From the ‡Science for Life Laboratory, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Box 1031, 17121 Solna, Sweden.

Molecular & Cellular Proteomics : MCP
|November 29, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Triqler, a new probabilistic model, improves protein quantification in label-free proteomics by accounting for all error sources. This approach enhances false discovery rate control and identifies more biologically relevant proteins, even in complex cancer data.

Keywords:
BioinformaticsBioinformatics softwareBiostatisticsBladder cancerLabel-free quantificationQuantification

More Related Videos

Bottom-up and Shotgun Proteomics to Identify a Comprehensive Cochlear Proteome
14:23

Bottom-up and Shotgun Proteomics to Identify a Comprehensive Cochlear Proteome

Published on: March 7, 2014

19.1K
Comprehensive Workflow of Mass Spectrometry-based Shotgun Proteomics of Tissue Samples
14:51

Comprehensive Workflow of Mass Spectrometry-based Shotgun Proteomics of Tissue Samples

Published on: November 13, 2021

6.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 2, 2026

LERLIC-MS/MS for In-depth Characterization and Quantification of Glutamine and Asparagine Deamidation in Shotgun Proteomics
08:01

LERLIC-MS/MS for In-depth Characterization and Quantification of Glutamine and Asparagine Deamidation in Shotgun Proteomics

Published on: April 9, 2017

8.6K
Bottom-up and Shotgun Proteomics to Identify a Comprehensive Cochlear Proteome
14:23

Bottom-up and Shotgun Proteomics to Identify a Comprehensive Cochlear Proteome

Published on: March 7, 2014

19.1K
Comprehensive Workflow of Mass Spectrometry-based Shotgun Proteomics of Tissue Samples
14:51

Comprehensive Workflow of Mass Spectrometry-based Shotgun Proteomics of Tissue Samples

Published on: November 13, 2021

6.1K

Area of Science:

  • Proteomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Cancer Research

Background:

  • Label-free shotgun proteomics is prone to errors affecting protein quantification.
  • Current analysis pipelines often fail to control the false discovery rate (FDR) due to ignored error sources and improper handling of filtered data.
  • This leads to a loss of sensitivity and biologically relevant findings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce Triqler, a probabilistic graphical model for robust protein quantification in label-free proteomics.
  • To improve FDR control and enhance the sensitivity of differential protein identification by propagating error information throughout the analysis.
  • To provide a more accurate and sensitive method for analyzing complex biological datasets, such as clinical cancer samples.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a probabilistic graphical model (Triqler) that utilizes distributions instead of point estimates for error propagation.
  • Implemented a novel missing value imputation strategy based on probabilistic distributions.
  • Applied Triqler to engineered datasets and a bladder cancer clinical dataset to assess FDR control and sensitivity.

Main Results:

  • Triqler achieved accurate FDR control and high sensitivity on engineered datasets, even for proteins with missing values.
  • In a bladder cancer dataset, Triqler identified 35 proteins at 5% FDR, significantly outperforming existing methods (1-4 proteins).
  • The proteins identified by Triqler were enriched for relevant functional annotations, unlike those identified by conventional methods.

Conclusions:

  • Triqler offers a significant advancement in label-free proteomics by effectively managing error sources and improving FDR control.
  • The model's ability to identify a larger set of biologically relevant proteins has implications for biomarker discovery in diseases like cancer.
  • Triqler is a fast, freely available computational tool that enhances the reliability and interpretability of proteomics data.