Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Methods to Test Visual Attention Online
Published on: February 19, 2015
Attentional cost in additional visual feedback protocols in healthy young subjects
Patrice R Rougier1, Paul-Henri Fleury2, Baptiste Tollenaere2
1Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire de Biologie de la Motricité, EA 7424, Université de Savoie-Mont-Blanc, Domaine Scientifique de Savoie-Technolac, 73376, Le Bourget du Lac cedex, France. patrice.rougier@univ-savoie.fr.
Visual feedback (VFB) enhances postural stability by modulating automatic and voluntary controls. Dual-tasking reveals how VFB protocols influence deterministic and stochastic activities for better balance and understanding neural circuits.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Biomechanics
- Human Motor Control
Background:
- Additional visual feedback (VFB) improves postural stability in healthy individuals by increasing muscular activity.
- Opposing trends in center-of-gravity (CGv) and center-of-pressure (CP) movements (CP-CGv) suggest a interplay between automatic and voluntary control.
- Understanding the neural circuits underlying these controls is crucial for optimizing VFB applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the specific contributions of automatic and voluntary controls in VFB protocols.
- To analyze postural behavior under dual-task conditions combining VFB with a cognitive navigation task.
- To elucidate the neural mechanisms and optimal usage conditions for VFB.
Main Methods:
- A dual-task protocol was implemented, involving three VFB conditions (no VFB, VFB based on body-weight distribution [VFB_BW], VFB based on CP displacements [VFB_CP]) with or without a concurrent cognitive task.
- Postural behaviors were assessed using variances of CP-CGv and CGv movements (mediolateral [ML] and anteroposterior [AP] axes).
- Fractional Brownian motion modeling parameters (transition points, scaling regimes) were used to evaluate deterministic and stochastic activity levels.
Main Results:
- Under VFB_CP with dual-tasking, deterministic activity in CP-CGv movements decreased, reducing variances and altering CGv correction without affecting CGv variances.
- Cognitive load during VFB_BW decreased CP-CGv and CGv movements along ML and AP axes, respectively, highlighting the attentional demands of VFB.
- While VFB generally decreased tonic postural activity (CP-CGv), its effect on CGv movements depended on the type of feedback (BW or CP).
Conclusions:
- Excessive voluntary control can be detrimental to CP-CGv movement magnitudes but beneficial for CGv movements during stance maintenance.
- VFB protocols engage significant attentional resources, influencing both automatic and voluntary postural control mechanisms.
- These findings provide insights into the neural circuits involved in VFB and specify conditions for its effective application.
More Related Videos
11:26Home-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Device Development: An Updated Protocol Used at Home in Healthy Subjects and Fibromyalgia Patients
Published on: July 14, 2018
06:12Virtual Prism Adaptation Therapy: Protocol for Validation in Healthy Adults
Published on: February 12, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Feedback Inhibition
Feedback Loops
Conjugate Addition (1,4-Addition) vs Direct Addition (1,2-Addition)
Conjugate addition results in a thermodynamically stable product. The reaction retains the stronger C=O bond at the expense of the weaker C=C π bond. The process is slow as the β carbon is less electrophilic than the carbonyl carbon.
Direct addition products are...
Effects of feedback
Feedback significantly modifies the gain of a control system. The gain of a system without feedback is altered by a factor of one plus GH, where G represents...
Feedback control systems
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...