Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Microfluidic Model to Mimic Initial Event of Neovascularization
Published on: April 10, 2021
Safety and clinically important events in PCP-initiated STEMI bypass in Ottawa
Simeon Mitchell1, Richard Dionne1, Justin Maloney1
1*Department of Emergency Medicine,University of Ottawa,Ottawa,ON.
Insights
Clinically important events occur in most ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) bypass patients, but primary care paramedics (PCPs) can safely manage them. Advanced care paramedic (ACP) protocols are rarely necessary for these STEMI transports.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Cardiology
- Paramedic Care
Background:
- ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients require rapid reperfusion therapy, often via primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- The role of different paramedic levels (primary care paramedic - PCP, advanced care paramedic - ACP) in transporting STEMI patients directly to PCI is crucial for timely treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify clinically significant events during STEMI bypass transports by PCP crews.
- To determine the proportion of these events manageable by PCP protocols versus those requiring ACP interventions.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective health record review of STEMI patients transported by PCP-only or PCP to ACP intercept crews between 2011-2015.
- Data collection focused on clinically important events, interventions, and mortality during paramedic transport.
Main Results:
- Of 214 STEMI bypass cases, 59.3% experienced clinically important events, most commonly hypotension (SBP < 90 mm Hg) and bradycardia (HR < 60).
- Only 42.5% of events could potentially be managed differently by ACP protocols, primarily fluid boluses for hypotension.
- PCP-only crews managed STEMI transports effectively, with low rates of arrest (0.9%) and in-hospital mortality (2.8%).
Conclusions:
- Clinically important events are frequent in STEMI bypass patients but often transient and of limited significance.
- PCP-only crews demonstrate the capacity to safely transport STEMI patients directly to primary PCI centers.
- ACP interventions are infrequently required for events encountered during STEMI bypass transports managed by PCPs.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to determine what clinically important events occur in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients transported for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) via a primary care paramedic (PCP) crew, and what proportion of such events could only be treated by advanced care paramedic (ACP) protocols.
Methods:
We conducted a health record review of STEMI transports by PCP-only crews and those transferred from PCP to ACP crews (ACP-intercept) from 2011 to 2015. A piloted data collection form was used to extract clinically important events, interventions during transport, and mortality.
Results:
We identified 214 STEMI bypass cases (118 PCP-only and 96 ACP-intercept). Characteristics were mean age 61.4 years; 44.4% inferior infarcts; mean response time 6 minutes, 19 seconds; total paramedic contact time 29 minutes, 40 seconds; and, in cases of ACP-intercept, 7 minutes, 46 seconds of PCP-only contact time. A clinically important event occurred in 127 (59.3%) of cases: SBP < 90 mm Hg (26.2%), HR < 60 (30.4%), HR > 100 (20.6%), arrhythmias 7.5%, altered mental status 6.5%, airway intervention 2.3%. Two patients (0.9%) arrested, both survived. Of the events identified, 42.5% could be addressed differently by ACP protocols. The majority related to fluid boluses for hypotension (34.6%). In the ACP-intercept group, ACPs acted on 51.6% of events. There were six (2.8%) in-hospital deaths.
Conclusions:
Although clinically important events are common in STEMI bypass patients, a smaller proportion of events would be addressed differently by ACP compared with PCP protocols. The majority of clinically important events were transient and of limited clinical significance. PCP-only crews can safely transport STEMI patients directly to primary PCI.
Related Concept Videos
Initiation of Translation
First, the initiator tRNA must be selected from the pool of elongator tRNAs by eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2). The initiator tRNA (Met-tRNAi) has conserved sequence elements including modified bases at...
Initiation of Translation
Survey Safety
Transcription Initiation
The promoters and enhancers and their accessory proteins allow tight regulation of...
Household Wiring And Electrical Safety
Integration of Synaptic Events

