Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 2, 2026

Transcorporal Artificial Urinary Sphincter Cuff Placement in a Case Requiring Revision for Urethral Atrophy
Published on: June 16, 2022
Artificial urinary sphincter revision with Quick Connects® versus suture-tie connectors: does technique make a
Jack R Andrews1, Brian J Linder1, Joseph A Scales1
1Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Quick-Connects (QC) are safe and effective for artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) revisions, showing no increased risk of failure compared to traditional suture-tied connections. This study supports QC use in AUS mechanical revisions.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation is a common treatment for urinary incontinence.
- Mechanical failures necessitate revision surgeries, where connection techniques can influence outcomes.
- Evaluating different connection methods is crucial for optimizing AUS revision procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the characteristics of mechanical failures in artificial urinary sphincters (AUS).
- To compare the outcomes of single-component AUS revisions using suture-tied connections versus Quick-Connects (QC).
Main Methods:
- A retrospective review of 46 patients undergoing single-component AUS revisions between 1983 and 2011.
- Categorization of revision techniques into suture-tie (pre-1996) and QC (post-1996).
- Evaluation of device success and potential associations with revision surgery, including connector type.
Main Results:
- 34 revisions used suture-tie connections, and 12 used QC.
- No statistically significant difference in 5-year device survival rates between suture-tie and QC (36% vs. 61%; p=0.85).
- QC revisions had zero device infections or repeat mechanical failures at the connector, unlike the suture-tie group (5 infections, 4 failures).
Conclusions:
- Quick-Connects (QC) demonstrate safety, efficiency, and reliability for single-component AUS revisions.
- No conclusive evidence links connector type to the overall risk of device failure in AUS revisions.
- The findings support the use of QC in AUS revision surgeries for mechanical failures.
Related Concept Videos
Sutures of the Skull
Sutures are immobile joints between adjacent bones of the skull. The narrow gap between the bones is filled with dense, fibrous connective tissue that unites the bones. The long sutures located between the skull bones are not straight but instead follow irregular, tightly twisting paths. These twisting lines tightly...
Electric Potential and Potential Difference
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test
Sum and Difference OpAmps
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...
Dietary Connections

